“borderline significant”

Participants cared for by other guardians demonstrated a lower likelihood of non-suppression that was borderline significant (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.33–1.00; p = 0.049).

The univariate model revealed that membranes thicker than 3 mm had significantly lower odds of perforation than others, with a borderline significant result in the multivariable analysis ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.07 respectively).

Mba et al found that OA was significantly less expensive overall ( P < 0.001), whereas Otoki et al suggested that LA may be less costly, though this result was only borderline significant ( P = 0.049; Table 3 ).

Similarly, comparing C max mean values of amikacin between patients treated in four different units, we did not find any significant difference ( P = 0.890), while difference between units in gentamicin C max mean values was borderline significant ( P = 0.049).

However TBAR was a borderline significant predictor (p = 0.049) of events whereas FMD was not (p = 0.44).

Quality of life functional scales showed a borderline significant result for mental functioning domain was found in favor of the control group ( p = 0.049).

No significant correlation was observed between placental SIRT-1 expression and T1D ( Table 2 , r=-0.428, p=0.145), however this correlation became borderline significant when adjusted for gestational age ( Table 2 , r=-0.578, p=0.049).

There was also borderline significant evidence (p=0.049) of an association between sex and DM status; men were more likely to have diabetes compared to women.

As depicted in Figure 5 , a borderline significant correlation ( p = 0.049) with change in total β -cell responsivity to glucose (Δ Φ tot ) could be established for GLP-1 in the SG group, whereas no correlation could be established for GIP. 4.

The difference by age group was observed in stage IA (borderline significant P = .049) and IB ( P = .009).

type, located completely within intron 2 (designated “Block 2” in the publication), had an odds ratio of 4.18 for nonresponse ( P = .012) [ 104 ]. In addition, the most common haplotype within a haplotype located in the 3′ untranslated region of PPARG (designated “Block 5” in the publication) had a borderline significant odds ratio of 0.51 for response ( P = .049) [ 104 ]. 4.

Patients with mild hypocapnia had a borderline significant association with increased in-hospital mortality (aHR 2.07; 95% CI 1.02–4.12— p = 0.049).

3.3 Stage group performance for RFS prognostication and stratification The patients were grouped into their conventional AJCC defined pathological stages (I, II, III), where stage was found to stratify patients into risk groups of RFS in the testing cohort, however, this stratification was only borderline significant (HR = 1.77 [95% CI: 1.05–2.97]; multivariable log‐rank: p = 0.049) as shown in Figure 4b .

The TUG test showed a borderline significant difference between fallers and non-fallers (14.84 vs. 20.19 seconds, p = 0.049), but the threshold used did not reliably distinguish fall risk.

Borderline significant results were obtained for MnSOD ( p = 0.049), COMT ( p = 0.084), NQO1 ( p = 0.065) and DNA Adducts ( p = 0.068).

However, surgeon preference demonstrated a borderline significant association, with one surgeon using PSI more frequently (χ2(1) = 3.32, P = 0.049, Cramér’s V = 0.13) (Table 1 ).

After adjustment for age and BMI, metabolites that showed borderline significant associations, given the FDR applied, were endpoint values of glucose (p = 0.049), pantothenate (p = 0.048) and change in glucose levels, i.e. delta values of glucose (p = 0.040), and pantothenate (p = 0.041).

For tumor volume, we found a borderline significant but weak effect ( p = 0.049) on the intrafraction motion in LR direction, with larger tumors showing more motion.

We observed borderline significant correlations between changes in activated CD4+ T cell and Cesarean section (r = 0.20, p = 0.049, Fig. 5a,b ) and islet autoimmunity (r = 0.24, p = 0.052, Fig. 5c,d ).

There was a statistically borderline significant difference in time to first exacerbation in favor of patients with no AE(s) to nintedanib (P=0.049) with no higher exacerbation risk in patients experiencing AE(s) ( Figure S10A,S10B ).

Under the original threshold of ≥ 19/21, attitude/stance remained significant (OR 1.48, p = 0.001), and male sex was borderline significant (OR 2.66, p = 0.049).

Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test showed a borderline significant difference when compared to the Swedish control population ( p = 0.049), the SweGen database ( p = 0.07), and the ExAC database ( p = 0.02).

For ADC, the overall effect of time was borderline significant (F (2, 40) = 3.25, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.14), but no significant pairwise differences were observed after Bonferroni correction.

MtCN was best explained by age (p<0.05), although the number of heteroplasmies also showed a slight correlation with mtCN that was borderline significant for shotgun sequencing data (p = 0.049, Fig 4 ).

BBB Kw Results Post‐operative changes in BBB Kw were observed in the MCA Perf territory, with Kw asymmetry showing a borderline significant improvement ( p = 0.049; Figure 4 ), shifting from a large pre‐op imbalance to near‐symmetry post‐op. 3.3.