A borderline significant association between SERPINA3 and the combined cardiac endpoint ( p = 0.048) was noted at 2-year follow-up in the univariate analysis of the AMI patients but was no longer evident after adjustment.
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
From the inspection of the EMMs and Figure 5 , this interaction is caused by an increase in sensitivity to targets in the Any Face condition, while making responses at the Sure level (Any Face: Sure – Gut = 0.66, SE = 0.11; Sure: Any Face – Human Face = 0.55, SE = 0.11); and a borderline significant three-way interaction between Disarray Coherence, Target Specificity, and Response Certainty, F (1, 229) = 3.95, p = 0.048, η 2 = 0.02.
When evaluating noncommercial and commercial websites by easy, average, and difficult readability categories, the SMOG detected a borderline significant difference with 60.4% of noncommercial sites coded as difficult versus 78.7% of commercial ( P = 0.048); no differences were detected with the other 4 measures.
Shapiro–Wilk tests indicated approximately normal within-subject difference scores for all outcomes across conditions (all p ≥ 0.17), except for the fatigue index, which was borderline significant ( W = 0.895, p = 0.048); this was not apparent in the plots.
247 ± 86.8 μm 2 with a borderline significant effect (−47.1 [−93.7; −0.5] p = 0. 048), which did not remain when adjusted for age and sex (−41.2 [−91.3; 8.9] p = 0.11).
Although each of these metrics was positively associated with tumor burden, none of these associations were strong, with only CMC demonstrating a borderline significant association (Spearman rho = 0.203, P = 0.048).
However, when the C*03:03/03:04 MM pairs were omitted, the aa differences were not significant anymore, while HLA-DPB1 became borderline significant (coefficient = 1.44, p = 0.048).
Adjusted for age, gender, and the MMSE score, patients with neurochemically possible AD had about 9 and 4 times larger odds to become demented within 3 and 5 years, respectively, compared to the reference category, although these estimates are statistically weak (borderline significant ( p = 0.048) after 3 years, and insignificant ( p = 0.12) after 5 years).
There was a borderline significant increase in epilepsy (OR:1.92, 95% CI: 1.01 to 3.29, p=0.048).
For ovarian cancer, we found a borderline significant association between ABCC12 expression and overall survival for grade 3 tumors (logrank P = 0.048; HR, 1.36; CI 1 to 1.85); however, this association was lost when all cancer grades were considered (logrank P = 0.16; Supplementary Fig. 1).
Improvement in PFS for HA-high tumors (stage 1 + 2) treated with PAG vs AG was borderline significant with an HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26–1.00; P = .048, and improvement in PFS for C3M/PRO-C3 ratio high tumors treated with PAG vs AG provided a HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17–0.92; P = .031 (stage 1) and a HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21–0.98; P = .026 (stage 2).
Although paired comparisons of color change after 50-minutes versus after 3 months in the 28 subjects with measurements at both time points revealed a borderline significant difference ( P =0.048; t -test for paired comparisons), it is interesting to note that six subjects actually experienced 0.5 to two shades improvement in color change during follow-up.
In patients with dumping based on the Sigstad questionnaire, the Arts questionnaire showed a borderline significant difference between groups in early dumping symptoms ( p = 0.048) at 5 years in favor of the S-RYGB.
In addition, apart from a borderline significant increase ( p = 0.048) in mean hepatic blood flow, no significant anti-VEGF-induced differences were observed ( p >0.05) in two additional physiological parameters, interstitial fluid volume and the organ blood flow rate, measured using indium-111-pentetate and rubidium-86 chloride, respectively.
Haplotype analysis revealed borderline significant association of breast cancer with ERCC6 Hap 5 (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00–1.69, p = 0.048) (Supplementary Table 2 ).
We observed that seroconversion rates were higher in the capital city Dushanbe (>90%) than in other districts (around 66%) and that this difference was borderline significant (p=0·048).
In our study, we found borderline significant differences in VSL ( P = 0.048) and VCL ( P = 0.038) between the two groups ( Table 2 ).
Although age showed a borderline significant association in the multivariate analysis before matching (HR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.000–1.079; p = 0.048), it was not significant after matching.
For Criterion D, the presence of surgical complications showed a borderline significant association with surgical success ( p = 0.048).
The post hoc Tukey’s test indicated that the TNT group had significantly higher maximum fixation strengths than Bare, while in the TNT+GC group, the difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.048 and p = 0.050, respectively).
Strong demethylation exhibited a borderline significant correlation with wild-type KRAS ( p = 0.048).
Mixed effects models between ICGA and the DCP were borderline significant ( p = 0.048; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 13.49), whereas all other imaging methods differed significantly.
Stroke was borderline significant in univariate analysis (OR = 0.68, p = 0.048), but this association was not significant in the multivariate analysis.
A borderline significant finding indicated that patients aged ≤60 years had higher tumor cell endoglin expression in effusions compared to older patients ( p = 0.048).
Excess significance testing showed no inflation for ORM1 or HP , while AZGP1 exhibited a borderline significant excess ( p = 0.048).