Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
From the inspection of the EMMs and Figure 5 , this interaction is caused by an increase in sensitivity to targets in the Any Face condition, while making responses at the Sure level (Any Face: Sure – Gut = 0.66, SE = 0.11; Sure: Any Face – Human Face = 0.55, SE = 0.11); and a borderline significant three-way interaction between Disarray Coherence, Target Specificity, and Response Certainty, F (1, 229) = 3.95, p = 0.048, η 2 = 0.02.
borderline significantP = 0.0481.0× alphagold
When evaluating noncommercial and commercial websites by easy, average, and difficult readability categories, the SMOG detected a borderline significant difference with 60.4% of noncommercial sites coded as difficult versus 78.7% of commercial ( P = 0.048); no differences were detected with the other 4 measures.
borderline significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Adjusted for age, gender, and the MMSE score, patients with neurochemically possible AD had about 9 and 4 times larger odds to become demented within 3 and 5 years, respectively, compared to the reference category, although these estimates are statistically weak (borderline significant ( p = 0.048) after 3 years, and insignificant ( p = 0.12) after 5 years).
borderline significantP = 0.0481.0× alphagold
For ovarian cancer, we found a borderline significant association between ABCC12 expression and overall survival for grade 3 tumors (logrank P = 0.048; HR, 1.36; CI 1 to 1.85); however, this association was lost when all cancer grades were considered (logrank P = 0.16; Supplementary Fig. 1).
borderline significantP = .0481.0× alphagold
Improvement in PFS for HA-high tumors (stage 1 + 2) treated with PAG vs AG was borderline significant with an HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26–1.00; P = .048, and improvement in PFS for C3M/PRO-C3 ratio high tumors treated with PAG vs AG provided a HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17–0.92; P = .031 (stage 1) and a HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21–0.98; P = .026 (stage 2).
borderline significantP =0.0481.0× alphagold
Although paired comparisons of color change after 50-minutes versus after 3 months in the 28 subjects with measurements at both time points revealed a borderline significant difference ( P =0.048; t -test for paired comparisons), it is interesting to note that six subjects actually experienced 0.5 to two shades improvement in color change during follow-up.
borderline significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
In addition, apart from a borderline significant increase ( p = 0.048) in mean hepatic blood flow, no significant anti-VEGF-induced differences were observed ( p >0.05) in two additional physiological parameters, interstitial fluid volume and the organ blood flow rate, measured using indium-111-pentetate and rubidium-86 chloride, respectively.