“borderline significant”

The 20 SNPs were separately examined for independent cross-sectional association with AF recurrence using a logistic regression analysis, and SNPs showing at least borderline significant associations (p<0.1) with AF recurrence were included in the final GRS model.

Significant and borderline significant values ( p < 0.1) were entered into stepwise forward multivariable logistic regression, including age as a continuous covariate, to estimate factors associated with mortality before hospital discharge.

In three out of five cases, the mutant allele was significantly over-represented, while in another instance (NSCLC cell line H2009) the over-representation was borderline significant (MAF = 0.66, BH adjusted P -value = 0.1).

The statistical significance level was p < 0.05 and, because the sample size was small, the borderline significant level was set as p < 0.1.

Variables that had statistically significant or borderline significant (p < 0.10) univariate associations with exercise adherence were included in a stepwise multivariate regression analyses.

62 With respect to self-reported doctor's diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, a borderline significant increase of risk was found in subjects exposed to railway noise levels ( L DEN ) of 50 dB and more (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.00–2.40; P < 0.10). 73 Aircraft noise Several studies within the last 10 years demonstrate a higher prevalence of annoyance, cardiovascular disease, or medication intake in persons exposed to aircraft noise.

Demographic, clinical, and diffusion metrics (DTI/FW) demonstrating significant ( P < 0.05) or borderline significant ( P ≤ 0.10) group differences were entered into Cox regression models using backward selection, with conversion to MCI as the outcome.

Sex-stratified results are reported where the p value for interaction appeared borderline significant (p<0.1).

The RR for an IQR PM 10 increase (7.3 mg/m 3 ) was 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.03) and borderline significant ( p < 0.10).

Age of informal caregivers were borderline significant positively associated with caregiver burden ( p < 0.1).

Mlakar, in 2011, reported a borderline significant association between rs74837985-C (Lys173Asp) in the GSTM1 gene with BMD lumbar spine values ( p = 0.100).

We examined the potential mediating role of VO 2peak for any PRO that was statistically or borderline significant ( p < 0.10) at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up.

Two of those taxa, Humicola nigrescens and Mortierella umbellata , showed also borderline significant ( p < 0.1) association with moving.

The difference in survival time for the FFR < 0.75 group ( n = 14) compared with the CDP > 27.9 group ( n = 26) was borderline significant ( P = 0.10).

25 Here, we measured the initial slope of this pH i recovery as an indirect measure of the apparent Na + /H + exchanger activity, revealing that there is a borderline significant difference between Slc4a11 +/+ and Slc4a11 −/− MCECs ( Fig. 3 C, paired t -test, 2-tailed P = 0.10, 1-tailed P = 0.05, n = 3 in each group) that can be attributed to Slc4a11 proton permeability. 25 H + -lactate − cotransporter: Because we recently demonstrated that lactate transport is a significant component of the corneal endothelial pump, 36 we next examined the lactate-dependent H + fluxes in MCECs.

In addition, BSA, the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and intropics use were borderline significant ( p < 0.10).

Because the sample was small ( N = 37), both significant ( p < .05) and borderline significant ( p < .1) correlations were noted.

Using a Cox PH model, statistically significant ( p ≤ 0.05) or borderline significant ( p < 0.1) prognostic factors identified from the univariate survival analyses, together with factors selected for hypothesis testing, were evaluated in multivariable survival models.

The forest plot categorizes predictors by statistical significance using color coding: significant predictors ( p < 0.05) in blue, borderline significant (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) in orange, and non-significant factors ( p ≥ 0.10) in red.

The intrinsic and integrated pathways were, however, borderline significant (at p < 0.10) and given the high levels of covariance between the factors, the non-significance of the pathways is likely due to suppressed covariance [ 47 ].

P -values >0.05 and <0.10 (borderline significant) are given where as any P -value >0.10 is given as nonsignificant.

D were borderline significant (p < 0.1).

The improvements from admission to discharge, 3 months and 12 months were all significant (linear mixed modelling; p=0.020, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively), and the improvement from discharge to 3-month follow-up was borderline significant (p<0.1).

A similar effect was observed among CU5, but this effect was not significant (OR = 0.65; 95% CI [0.28–1.54]), while for individuals of all ages the reduction was less pronounced (OR = 0.72; 95% CI [0.49–1.06]) and only borderline significant ( p < 0.1).

Variables significant ( p < 0.05) or borderline significant in other analyses were included in univariate logistic regression analysis ( p < 0.10).