“borderline significant”

In contrast, in the control group, there was a significant decrease in intakes of protein, fat, calcium, B12, and folic acid ( p < 0.05) and a borderline significant decrease in intakes of iron and vitamin A ( p < 0.1) (Table 4 ) .

Considering the positive/negative classification of the DII, a positive score (pro-inflammatory) was associated with a small borderline significant increase in risk for incident hypertension, only after adjustment for BMI (HR + = 1.03 [0.99: 1.06], p = 0.10).

All tests were two-sided and results that were statistically borderline significant at p≤0.1 (#) and significant at p ≤0.05 (*) and ≤0.01 (**).

Odds ratio values varied between 1.10 and 1.23 and were statistically significant (p<.05) in fifteen cases, borderline significant (p<.10) in two cases and not significant (p=.15) in one.

The independent variables had a borderline significant association with MBS or EPDS scores (p-value<0.1).

The factors that had significant or borderline significant (P<0.1) correlation with OS or RFS by univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.

Factors found to be significant or borderline significant ( P < 0.1) from univariate analyses were modelled together, and only those which remained statistically significant for at least 1 of the group comparisons were retained in the final prediction models.

Each factor was scored as positively (+) or negatively associated (−) if the association was statistically significant (p < 0.05), or borderline significant (p < 0.10), otherwise, we labeled the factor as ‘no evidence for an association’ (0).

The value of the probability of the first type error p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ( p < 0.10 was reported as borderline significant).

Funnel plots and the Egger regression test suggested a borderline significant asymmetry in the analysis of type 2 diabetes ( P = 0.10).

Mediation of subthreshold depressive and anxiety symptoms In Table 3 , we show the mediation of subthreshold depressive symptoms on the associations between pain and recurrence of depression which were analysed as borderline significant or significant in the Cox regression analyses (p < .10).

Risk factors associated with delayed union For the evaluation of risk factors, all variables that exhibited significant or borderline significant differences ( p < 0.1) between the groups were selected for logistic regression analysis to estimate the ORs and 95% CI.

In both sensitivity analyses, the results for gestational age were borderline significant ( P < 0.10; data not shown).

Decreased white blood cell (WBC) count (odds ratio=0.831, p=0.079) predicted pruritus and was found to be statistically borderline significant (0.05 < p < 0.10) (Table 4 ).

However, when we compared dabigatran and warfarin users under 65, the adjusted hazard ratio was borderline significant (P<0.1) (adjusted hazard ratio 1.33, 0.98 to 1.83), suggesting a potentially increased risk associated with dabigatran.

Regarding only the 68 PSGs that were down-regulated in naked mole-rat and up-regulated during rat aging (quadrant I, Fig 2 ), “cellular respiration” showed a significant (p = 2.4*10 −7 ) and “translation” a borderline significant enrichment (p = 0.10; S23 Table ).

However, the real-time PCR (RT-PCR) results of PCNA and CCND1 revealed borderline significant differences between the HBM and LBM groups ( p < 0.1).

We regard a coefficient to be significant if its corresponding p -value is p < 0.05 and to be borderline significant if 0.05 < p < 0.1.

The parametric test adjusting for experiment indicated that higher expression of the PCB exposure status was associated with higher expression of the probe; however, the parametric test was borderline significant [linear regression P = 0.1 (Bonferroni adjusted), P = 0.002].

The association between modern method use and exposure to Tupange television program was found to be negative and borderline significant ( p < 0.10).

Furthermore, the median pressure variance measured at one week was borderline significant between the 3 machines (Autoset Spirit: 1.86, RemStar Auto: 3.31, GK-420: 3.01, 0.05 < p <0.1).

The 20 SNPs were separately examined for independent cross-sectional association with AF recurrence using a logistic regression analysis, and SNPs showing at least borderline significant associations (p<0.1) with AF recurrence were included in the final GRS model.

In the pooled analyses for fibrinogen, borderline significant ( p < 0.1) positive associations were observed for NO x and traffic load within 100 m (in the two highest categories) without evidence of heterogeneity ( Table 3 , Figure 1 ).

Significant and borderline significant values ( p < 0.1) were entered into stepwise forward multivariable logistic regression, including age as a continuous covariate, to estimate factors associated with mortality before hospital discharge.

In three out of five cases, the mutant allele was significantly over-represented, while in another instance (NSCLC cell line H2009) the over-representation was borderline significant (MAF = 0.66, BH adjusted P -value = 0.1).