“borderline significant”

There was a borderline significant association between staff eating together with the children, and children drinking less sweet drinks (B = −35.17, p < 0.10). 4.

Similarly, HIF1α expression showed a borderline significant moderate positive correlation with Snail expression rho = 0.50, P = 0.10.

D were borderline significant (p < 0.1).

3.5 Publication bias Funnel plots and the Egger regression test suggested a borderline significant asymmetry in the analysis of T2D ( P = 0.10).

Samples from leprosy patients showed down-regulation of CCL2, CCL3, CCL4 (p<0.05), while IL1β and SOD2 were borderline significant (p<0.1), confirming a repression of these genes by M. leprae ex vivo , as was observed in vitro in THP-1 ( Figure 2 ).

Although significant positive associations with LDL cholesterol and triglycerides among males were attenuated with the inclusion of lifestyle variables in Model 3, positive borderline significant associations ( p < 0.1) were observed between Western dietary pattern and LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides ( Table 5 ).

Also, increases in valine and leucine levels were borderline significant ( p < 0.1) by NMR only for long-lived ALS patients (Fig. 5a ).

Identification of HCC-related RT Mutations There were 15 mutations that tended to show a borderline significant difference in the mutation rate between the HCC and control groups ( P <0.100, Table 2 ).

Awareness of having the genetic test and PSA level at inclusion (HR = 1.16) were borderline significant predictors of a repeat PSA test ( P <0.1) in multivariate analysis, whereas perceived risk of getting PC or dying from PC were non-significant ( P ≥0.1).

For those delivering in a BEOC facility or at home, the difference between the amount paid by the poorest and the least poor was borderline significant (p<0.1).

Atorvastatin showed a reduction in the HR that was significant in model 1, borderline significant in model 2 (HR = 0.90, CI 0.79–1.02, p < 0.1) and not significant in model 3 (Table 2A ; fig. 1A, D ).

Given this, and the borderline significant K-M analysis result (P < 0.1) observed for miR-193b-3p in our 130 NDMM patients, all three miRNAs (hsa-miR-483-3p, let-7b-5p, and hsa-miR-193-5p) were thus included in the subsequent analysis.

The interaction was borderline significant for the category >300 min ( p = 0.10).

The influence of the level of breaks at work and attitudes towards interrupting sitting at work was borderline significant (P < .10; see Table 3 ).

The second most identified barrier, Inadequate clinic support , was borderline significant in terms of acceptability of prenatal care (p < 0.1).

After entering items, which were statistically significant or borderline significant ( P < 0.1) in the univariate analysis, into multiple logistic regression analysis considering multicollinearity, the items shown in Table 4 remained significant.

The use of the word ‘donation’ rather than ‘contribution’ resulted in a slightly higher response rate (non-significant), much higher average positive monetary gifts (borderline significant at p < 0.1), and a much higher overall monetary return (significant at p < 0.05).

Probabilities of individual data points being different are indicated on graphs as p ≤ .0001 (***), p ≤ .001 (**), p ≤ .05 (*), p ≤ .1 or borderline significant (b) and p > .1 or insignificant (no indicator).

60 , 61 , 62 An α =0.05 was used for all the analyses, and P -values >0.05 and <0.10 were considered borderline significant for main effects, whereas a P -value <0.10 was considered significant for interaction terms 63 before multiple testing correction.

13 Conversely, Yazdani et al demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in medication use among eyes receiving adjunctive intravitreal Bevacizumab at Months 1 and 3 (P=0.1 and P=0.06 respectively), but not at Month 6 (P=0.18); nonetheless, in their comparison group, which received the same standard treatments, except for Bevacizumab, no reduction in medicatio

For females, the main effects were significant in the 20 checks, while the interaction term was borderline significant (p<0.10 in 18 of 20 checks).

Multivariable analyses by event type SVT ( table 4 ): Female sex, lower educational attainment, failure to specify level of maximum alcohol consumption, history of immobility and family history of first-degree relatives with varicose veins showed significant (or for immobility, borderline significant, p<0.1) positive relations, while African-American ethnicity appeared protective in the limited (age–sex) adjustment models.

81 A type I error of 0.05 was used for all analyses, with P -values between 0.05 and 0.10 considered as borderline significant for main effects, and P -value <0.10 considered significant for interaction terms, 82 before multiple testing correction.

Variables with significant ( p < 0.05) or borderline significant p -values ( p < 0.1) were further analysed using multivariable Cox regression to determine predictors of OS, PFS, LR-PFS, and DMFS.

Some borderline significant classes (unadjusted p < 0.1) are also worth noting (Table 3 ).