“borderline significant”

For the IL1RL1 gene, an additional marker (rs1041973) showed borderline significant association (p-value = 0.100).

In linear modelling cannabis use was significantly linked with anal stenosis, congenital hydrocephalus and Turner syndrome (ACT) and was significantly linked in borderline significant models (model P < 0.1) with microtia, microphthalmia, and transposition of the great vessels.

If statistical interactions were borderline significant (0.05 < p < 0.1) and the observed power was low (<0.5), individual t -tests were performed as noted in the description of the results.

All covariates that were statistically significant ( P < .05) or borderline significant ( P < .1 and > .05) in the bivariate analysis and those considered to be clinically significant were included in the multivariate Cox regression analysis by backward elimination of the variables.

Sex and significant or borderline significant (p < 0.1) risk factors for any elevated IgE in bi-variate analyses were included as independent variables in the multivariate models.

After stratifying on sex, the BPA effects were positive and significant among boys on Emotionally Reactive and Aggressive Behavior and positive and borderline significant ( p < 0.1) on Sleep Problems, Withdrawn, Internalizing Problems, and Externalizing Problems, indicating that boys with prenatal BPA exposure in the highest concentration quartile had, on average, more reported symptoms of problems in these areas.

If any of the adherence groups in any of the models were significant or borderline significant (p < 0.1), we re-ran the models with that one omitted to check for ‘masking’ of effects of the other two groups.

Regarding the type of S aureus , colonization was MSSA in 89 cases, MRSA in 10 cases, and both MSSA and MRSA in 3 cases. In the univariable models, S aureus colonization was predicted by recent (in the last 6 months) illicit drug use, with borderline significant associations ( P ≤ .10) with public gym use, having a skin condition, and hospitalization.

Interactions between covariates and noise were borderline significant (0.05 < p < 0.10) for sex, obesity, marital status, and trait anxiety, in the model for any insomnia symptom ( Table 1 ).

Significant and borderline significant results ( p < 0.1) were included in the multivariate analysis.

Gender, fentanyl, other pain medication during procedure, remifentanil and antiemetic medication rose to statistical significance ( p < 0.05) (Tables 4 and 5 ). Oxycodone, general anesthesia, plexus block and postoperative pain medication were borderline significant ( p < 0.10) (Tables 5 and 6 ).

Adjusting for annoyance and air pollutants PM 10 and NO 2 revealed a borderline significant association ( p < 0.1) of L NIGHT ≥ 50 dB(A) with a better score on one of the trail making tests ( Supplementary Materials, Table S2 ). 3.2.

CD163 + cell infiltration was significantly correlated with entropy ( p = 0.015) and BM SUV ( p = 0.020), and showed a borderline significant correlation with CoV SUV and BLR ( p < 0.10).

There are several other borderline significant associations (p<0.1) that was much larger among past users. are presented in Table 4 , but not discussed here.

HGB exhibited a borderline significant increase ( p < 0.1) at 6 weeks and a significant increase ( p < 0.05) after 8 weeks of intervention.

We also determined FLI1, a transcription factor involved in development and cancer migration and invasion 44 , 45 , as the next best candidate enriched for MIBC-specific enhancers though its expression in MIBC cell lines and patients was borderline significant ( p -value = 0.1 for cell lines and p -value = 0.07 for tissue.) (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 6 ).

To further investigate independent determinants of the counseling format used (verbal-numerical-visual) we performed a multinomial logistic regression analysis including all physician and patient characteristics showing at least a borderline significant (i.e. p <0.1) bivariate association with the counseling format.

These differences were significant ( p < 0.05) for 8 micro-parameters and borderline significant ( p < 0.10) for another 8.

We regard a coefficient to be significant if its corresponding p -value is p < 0.05 and to be borderline significant if 0.05 < p < 0.1.

At the same time, there was no association of inpatient mortality with the period of admission, sex, race/ethnicity, or any individual comorbidities including T2DM, hypertension or hyperlipidemia (all P > 0.05), although the association with diabetes was borderline significant ( P < 0.10).

In the second step, significant or borderline significant terms in bivariate analyses ( p < 0.10) were combined in multivariable models.

To evaluate factors that have independent association with persistent smoking, we did multiple logistic regression analysis by putting age, sex, and those variables that were found to have a at least borderline significant ( P <0.100) association with persistent smoking in age and sex adjusted analysis as covariates.

Considering the positive/negative classification of the DII, a positive score (pro-inflammatory) was associated with a small borderline significant increase in risk for incident hypertension, only after adjustment for BMI (HR + = 1.03 [0.99: 1.06], p = 0.10).

After adjustment for sex and age at baseline as well as the number of intervention visits, the group differences in the changes of risk factors persisted either statistically significant or borderline significant (p<0.1, see table 3 ).

Changes in Health Outcomes Across Digital Phenotypes Table 4 summarizes the 3-month changes in z BMI, diet, physical activity, and screen time across children’s and parents’ digital phenotypes, with statistically significant ( P <.05) or borderline significant ( P< .10) comparisons shown in Figure 7 , where panels A to C show child outcomes across child phenotypes, and panels D and E show child outcomes across parent phenotypes.