“borderline significant”

Those that were determined to be borderline significant ( p -value < 0.1) were then included in the multivariable multinomial logistic regression model in order to prevent false negatives when determining the covariates that were associated with class assignment.

For the GP cohort, the HEV prevalence was higher with each year’s increase in age (p<0.01) and borderline significant for men (p = 0.10).

We found a statistically significant linear sex-by-overall-metals-exposure interaction term (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.8, 2.5), as well as statistically significant sex-by-pollutant interactions for nickel and antimony, and borderline significant interactions ( p < 0.10) for cadmium, lead, and trichloroethylene.

The relationship of age to response at endpoint was borderline significant ( P = .10), with older individuals being less likely to respond at endpoint.

From 2004 to 2009 no significant changes were seen among the FFS farmers, while the neighbor farmers still improved significantly, as the variables ‘No use of pesticide WHO class 1’, ‘Knowledge of alternatives to pesticide use’ and ‘Good personal protection when handling pesticides’ became significant (p < 0.05), while the variables ‘Good technical handling’ and Good knowledge of pesticide toxicity’ became borderline significant (p < 0.10) and ‘No self-reported symptoms after spraying past month became non-significant (p > 0.05) changing from being significant at first follow up.In Figure 2 the change is illustrated in a graph showing that the FFS farmers almost doubled their mean KAP-score during their intensive training period from 2002 to 2004 with no further improvement there after while the neighbor farmers showed a steadier but less pronounced improvement through the whole period from 2002 to 2009.

Borderline significant evidence (0.05 < p < 0.10) for a directionally consistent association with recurrence was demonstrated for rs1800795 ( IL6 ) and rs25487 ( XRCC1 ) [ 14, 15 ].

Other factors were associated with an increased odds of CE but results were only borderline significant ( P < 0.1).

For total n -3 FA and the ratio of n -6: n -3 FA, the contrasts were borderline significant ( p < 0.10).

For four other knowledge statements, the differences between low and adequate HL were borderline significant (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

An avoidant coping style, although significantly related to short-term prognosis of emotional status, was only borderline significant at long-term followup ( B = 0.38, P < 0.10).

Statistically significant and borderline significant variables ( P <0.1) were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Factors associated with readmission that were significant or borderline significant ( p < 0.1) in univariate analysis were eligible for the multivariate logistic regression model.

For pathway 1, the TXNRD1 selenoprotein variant rs11111979, an intron 3′–5′UTR SNP previously associated with healthy aging [ 35 ], remained borderline significant for an association with CRC risk ( P ACT = 0.100; P ACT significance threshold was P < 0.1) in the recessive genetic model.

No association with FVC and a borderline significant association with FEV1 were found in Model I with evidence of heterogeneity ( P < 0.10) for both these outcomes—Table 2 .

As presented in Table 4 , borderline significant differences ( p < .10) were found regarding other aspects, too.

Walking independence At the end of the intervention, assisted walking interventions resulted in a borderline significant improvement in the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) compared with control interventions (MD 0.36, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.78, p = 0.10, I 2 = 39%; Figure 11 ; Chang et al., 2012 ; Morone et al., 2011 ; Ng et al., 2008 ; Teixeira da Cunha Filho et al., 2002 ).

The latter result was borderline significant (p=0.1) but remarkable in view of the lower age in NBS heterozygotes (42 y vs. 57 y in controls).

However, the multi-parameter analysis ( Supplementary Table S2F ) could not confirm this tendency, as only a borderline significant association of prophylactic strategy group with rejection (−0.83 ± 0.51, p = 0.100) was observed; there was no evidence of an effect of sex, nor of the interaction with prevention strategy.

Post hoc comparisons showed a borderline significant decrease of anxiety symptoms at post-test, p < .10; η p 2 = .13, and a significant decrease at follow-up-1, p < .01; η p 2 = .32, as compared to pre-test.

Finally, we asked whether there was significant overlap in borderline significant systems with an association p-value < 0.1.

To build a predictive model, all potential risk factors showing at least borderline significant statistical association with malaria (p < 0.1) were included in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Statistically significant and borderline significant variables (P<0.1) were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

In linear modelling cannabis use was significantly linked with anal stenosis, congenital hydrocephalus and Turner syndrome (ACT) and was significantly linked in borderline significant models (model P < 0.1) with microtia, microphthalmia, and transposition of the great vessels.

For the IL1RL1 gene, an additional marker (rs1041973) showed borderline significant association (p-value = 0.100).

All covariates that were statistically significant ( P < .05) or borderline significant ( P < .1 and > .05) in the bivariate analysis and those considered to be clinically significant were included in the multivariate Cox regression analysis by backward elimination of the variables.