Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0781.6× alphagold
At the end of follow-up, patients with IST showed borderline significant severe proteinuria (1.08 g/24 h vs. 0.44 g/24 h, p = 0.078); however, patients with IST had similar eGFR values (54.5 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 vs. 67.3 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , p = 0.20), proportions of progression to dialysis (12.5% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.61) and composite kidney endpoints (18.8% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.38) compared with those not receiving IST among patients excluded due to proteinuria less than 1 g/24 h ( Table 2 ).
borderline significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Wedge resection was independent risk factor associated with statistical significant poorer OS (HR, 1.255; 95% CI, 1.022 to 1.540; P = 0.012) and borderline significant poor LCSS (HR, 1.292; 95% CI, 0.972 to 1.718; P = 0.079) than lobectomy while segmentectomy had comparable OS (HR, 0.817; 95% CI, 0.565 to 1.180; P = 0.286) and LCSS (HR, 0.892; 95% CI, 0.5490 to 1.469; P = 0.652) compared with lobectomy in patients with NSCLC≤1 cm.
borderline significantP = .0791.6× alphagold
Among the extended indicators, only femoral neck BMD showed a borderline significant inverse association with fractures (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.52–1.04, P = .079), whereas ALM/BMI, sagittal abdominal diameter, glucocorticoid exposure, and family history did not reach statistical significance.
borderline significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
The carrier status of at least one copy of COMT A_C_C_G haplotype determines low metabolic activity of COMT enzyme, and patients with at least one copy of A_C_C_G haplotype show better clinical outcome measured by ODI score, compared with non-carriers, who inherited a combination of G_C_G_G, A_T_C_A or A_T_G_G haplotypes (i.e., subjects without A_C_C_G haplotype), although the recorded improvement in ODI score was only borderline significant ( p = 0.079, Table 3 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
In contrast, women reporting higher levels of financial stress had lower levels of 6,12 channel F2-isoprostanes (β = −0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.007) and this borderline significant association was comparable in African American women (β = −0.06, SE = 0.03, p = 0.079) and Whites (β = −0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.050) ( Table 3 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Univariable analysis showed that thoracoscopy (shown above) and less blood loss (<350 mL 16.3%, ≥350 mL 30.2%; p = 0.022) were associated with PPC prevention, whereas laparoscopy showed a borderline significant association (laparoscopy 15.4%, laparotomy 26.9%; p = 0.079).
borderline significantp =0.0791.6× alphagold
Additionally, the result of HNSCC samples from TCGA by survival analysis showed borderline significant ( p =0.079) on OS ( Figure 4(b) ) and significant survival differences on PFS as well as DSS ( p =0.016; p =0.0079) (Figures 4(c) and 4(d) ), with HNSCC samples in the C1 subtype having a longer median survival time and a higher survival rate. 3.3.
borderline significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Detailed analyses of the previously associated SNPs rs1024611 and rs2857656 demonstrated a borderline significant association in the Guinea-Bissau population for rs1024611 under the dominant model (AA (referent) versus AG & GG, OR = 1.36, 95% CI [0.96–1.93], p = 0.079) ( Table 3 ).
borderline significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
After multivariable adjustment, the difference in risk of bone recurrence persisted (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.83, P = 0.005); however, the difference in risk of brain recurrence was only borderline significant (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.81, P = 0.079).
borderline significantp = 0.07961.6× alphagold
The analysis identified multiple significant effects: for Treatment (as expected), F = 21.40, df = 1,14, p = 0.0004, and for Gender, F = 5.62, df = 1, 14, p = 0.0326; with a borderline significant Gender by Treatment interaction, F = 3.57, df = 1, 14, p = 0.0796).