Also a borderline significant correlation between increasing differentiation grade and TBS was observed (P = 0.078).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
At the end of follow-up, patients with IST showed borderline significant severe proteinuria (1.08 g/24 h vs. 0.44 g/24 h, p = 0.078); however, patients with IST had similar eGFR values (54.5 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 vs. 67.3 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , p = 0.20), proportions of progression to dialysis (12.5% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.61) and composite kidney endpoints (18.8% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.38) compared with those not receiving IST among patients excluded due to proteinuria less than 1 g/24 h ( Table 2 ).
In addition, those with paraplegia exhibited higher debris scores than those with hemiplegia; however, the finding was only borderline significant (mean difference = 0.30, P -value = .078).
Additionally, there was a borderline significant inverse association between n-6 LC-PUFA in CB serum and eczema [0.83 (0.68–1.02), p = 0.0784].
In the younger population (age < 65 years old), the HCC risk was borderline significant between the high- and low-risk groups (HR = 8.51, 95%CI: 0.78-92.86, P = 0.079).
However, we observed that z-score–standardized TDCPP concentrations had a borderline significant effect on ESCC risk (aHR = 1.17, p = 0.079), suggesting a potential nonlinear relationship (Table S6 ).
Wedge resection was independent risk factor associated with statistical significant poorer OS (HR, 1.255; 95% CI, 1.022 to 1.540; P = 0.012) and borderline significant poor LCSS (HR, 1.292; 95% CI, 0.972 to 1.718; P = 0.079) than lobectomy while segmentectomy had comparable OS (HR, 0.817; 95% CI, 0.565 to 1.180; P = 0.286) and LCSS (HR, 0.892; 95% CI, 0.5490 to 1.469; P = 0.652) compared with lobectomy in patients with NSCLC≤1 cm.
However, there was a borderline significant difference in the number of non-smokers and moderate smokers (χ 2 = 3.081, P = 0.079; χ 2 = 3.642, P = 0.056).
The P per interaction values for treatment by sex subgroup resulted in significant ( P = 0.044) for the on-statin pool or borderline significant ( P = 0.079) in the statin-intolerant group, suggesting an enhanced response in females compared to males.
Among the extended indicators, only femoral neck BMD showed a borderline significant inverse association with fractures (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.52–1.04, P = .079), whereas ALM/BMI, sagittal abdominal diameter, glucocorticoid exposure, and family history did not reach statistical significance.
The association between participation in community organizations and PMTCT uptake was borderline significant for women in groups that discussed HIV (44.5 versus 34.2% for those not in organizations; aOR 1.41, 95% CI 0.96–2.06, P = 0.079) ( Fig. 1 c).
Parity emerges as the strongest predictor, showing a significant negative association with PAPP-A levels ( p = 0.026), while its effect on NT is weaker and only borderline significant ( p = 0.079).
The carrier status of at least one copy of COMT A_C_C_G haplotype determines low metabolic activity of COMT enzyme, and patients with at least one copy of A_C_C_G haplotype show better clinical outcome measured by ODI score, compared with non-carriers, who inherited a combination of G_C_G_G, A_T_C_A or A_T_G_G haplotypes (i.e., subjects without A_C_C_G haplotype), although the recorded improvement in ODI score was only borderline significant ( p = 0.079, Table 3 ).
The presence of PDA is borderline significant ( p = 0.079), suggesting a potential but inconclusive effect.
In the fecal fermentation experiments, a borderline significant ( p = 0.079) increase of 37% in CTX resistance was observed for CP and a non-significant ( p = 0.190) increase of 13% for CL at the highest concentrations comparing with the blank samples.
In contrast, women reporting higher levels of financial stress had lower levels of 6,12 channel F2-isoprostanes (β = −0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.007) and this borderline significant association was comparable in African American women (β = −0.06, SE = 0.03, p = 0.079) and Whites (β = −0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.050) ( Table 3 ).
Univariable analysis showed that thoracoscopy (shown above) and less blood loss (<350 mL 16.3%, ≥350 mL 30.2%; p = 0.022) were associated with PPC prevention, whereas laparoscopy showed a borderline significant association (laparoscopy 15.4%, laparotomy 26.9%; p = 0.079).
S3C-F ) or borderline significant for VRC26.25 when the cutoff was set as 25% ( p = 0.079, Figure.
The difference between the two groups was statistically borderline significant ( p = 0.079).
Borderline significant difference ( p value = 0.079) was only found by the allelic model between the control group and the CIN1/CIN2 patients’ subgroup for the polymorphism rs16970849.
Additionally, the result of HNSCC samples from TCGA by survival analysis showed borderline significant ( p =0.079) on OS ( Figure 4(b) ) and significant survival differences on PFS as well as DSS ( p =0.016; p =0.0079) (Figures 4(c) and 4(d) ), with HNSCC samples in the C1 subtype having a longer median survival time and a higher survival rate. 3.3.
Detailed analyses of the previously associated SNPs rs1024611 and rs2857656 demonstrated a borderline significant association in the Guinea-Bissau population for rs1024611 under the dominant model (AA (referent) versus AG & GG, OR = 1.36, 95% CI [0.96–1.93], p = 0.079) ( Table 3 ).
After multivariable adjustment, the difference in risk of bone recurrence persisted (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.83, P = 0.005); however, the difference in risk of brain recurrence was only borderline significant (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.81, P = 0.079).
There was no significant correlation between the left ( r = −0.242, p = 0.143) or right ( r = −0.089, p = 0.595) foramen diameter and the EDSS, though there was a borderline significant correlation when the diameters of the right and left foramina were summed ( r = −0.288, p = 0.079).
The analysis identified multiple significant effects: for Treatment (as expected), F = 21.40, df = 1,14, p = 0.0004, and for Gender, F = 5.62, df = 1, 14, p = 0.0326; with a borderline significant Gender by Treatment interaction, F = 3.57, df = 1, 14, p = 0.0796).