“borderline significant”

The between-condition changes remain when restricting data to male subjects only (Figures 4(A2) – 4(D2) ), except that the reduction during walking in PI becomes borderline significant ( p = 0.077; Figure 4(A2) ). 4.

The enrichment of putatively functional germline variants in cancer predisposition genes is borderline significant when compared to healthy populations ( P = 0.077; Odds Ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence intervals, 0.94−2.21) and significantly more pronounced against adult-onset cancers ( P = 0.016; Odds Ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence intervals, 1.10−3.91).

The association was borderline significant when GC and GG carriers were grouped and compared with CC patients ( p = 0.077) [ 35 ].

21/36 (58%) in sporadic clear cell carcinomas (borderline significant with P = 0.077 by Fisher's exact test).

0.6 ± 0.1, respectively, p = 0.048) and a borderline significant difference in the number of segments with functional recovery (4.4 ± 2.6 vs. 2.9 ± 2.1, respectively, p = 0.077).

CT had no independent effect on Hb levels (P = 0.596), and iron saturation had no significant predictive power (P = 0.277); however, there was a borderline significant direct relationship between Hb levels and iron therapy (P = 0.077; beta coefficient: 0.25 g/dL).

The other two studies examined both early and late failures and failed to find a statistically significant result, although Jacobi-Gresser et al found a borderline significant association ( p =0.077). 24 The IL-1A interleukin has been previously linked to peri-implantitis, which is one of the most common causes of late implant failure. 28 The only study which showed a statistically significant association between the IL-1A polymorphism and implant failure, however, was the study which examined only early implant failures.

The comparison between low-risk and high-risk was borderline significant (p = 0.077), whereas the comparison between low-risk and intermediate-risk was not significant (p = 0.803).

Interaction between sex and CD-group and LA contraction strain was borderline significant (p=0.077).

Only borderline significant associations of the presence of proteinuria with renalase FE (positive, median 0.030 vs 0.013, p = 0.077) and StURR (negative, median 0.76 vs 1.27, p = 0.051) were observed.

Although further studies are necessary, there is a possibility that longer second-line chemotherapy might reflect better PS, as we found a borderline significant ( P = 0.077, data not shown) association between good PS and second-line chemotherapy of ≥ 19 weeks.

08) and post hoc testing confirmed a borderline significant decrease during guided breathing ( p = 0 . 077).

A negative and borderline significant correlation was observed between miRNA-210 and TSAT ( ρ = −0.269; p = 0.0775).

1f , borderline significant P = 0.0777, t test).

3 , we found that urinary albumin excretion rate significantly correlated with miR-29a (r = 0.286, p = 0.016), however, its correlation with miR-29b was borderline significant (r = 0.212, p = 0.078), while no significant correlation (r = 0.151, p = 0.211) was found between miR-29c and urinary albumin excretion rate.

Regarding FPs’ beliefs about prevention, a feeling of good effectiveness (Parameter = 0.27, moderate association, P = 0.001) and, to a lesser extent, a need for a better training (Parameter = 0.14, weak association and borderline significant, P = 0.078) were both positive predictors of PREV-Role .

As seen in Table 3 , there were no significant differences in FNS score across the National Group, for most factors except for educational level, where the difference is borderline significant ( p = 0.078). 4.

PERMANOVA analysis revealed a borderline significant difference in centroids between groups ( p = 0.078), which was less apparent at the baseline ( p = 0.341).

In the group of participants who self-reported more PA, determined via their PAQ-A-score, a lower prevalence of LBP was found, but, in this case, the association was borderline significant ( p = 0.078).

This aligns with the borderline significant association ( p ≈ 0.078), suggesting greater knowledge fosters more confident, health-positive attitudes.

In addition, histological type (OR: 3.423; 95%CI: 1.677–6.987; P < 0.001), depth of myometrial invasion (OR: 2.060; 95% CI: 1.073–3.956; P = 0.030), cervical involvement (OR: 2.336; 95% CI: 1.117–4.884; P = 0.024), parametrial involvement (OR: 7.846; 95% CI: 1.626–37.858; P = 0.010) and HGB (OR: 0.983; 95% CI: 0.967–0.999; P = 0.039) remained significant predictors of LNM, whereas histological grade was borderline significant (OR: 2.232; 95% CI: 0.915–5.444; P = 0.078).

When the relation was tested among ever and never smokers, the association of BMI with MSI was only evident among never smokers with a borderline significant interaction, p = 0.078.

However, a borderline significant association was observed with new cardiac events (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.551; P = 0.078) during the follow-up period (521.1 ± 44.7 days).

However, when all studies contributing OS and DFS data are combined, the overall effect estimate becomes more modest and borderline significant (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.04; P=0.078).

However, after adjusting for sex, age, and diabetes, we obtained results that were borderline significant ( p = 0.078).