Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.07981.6× alphagold
3 b), and a borderline significant difference between the filtered lipid (5/10) and retained serum (8/10) cultures ( p = 0.0798; one-tailed Chi square), and filtered serum (6/10) and retained lipid (9/10) ( p = 0.0607; one-tailed Chi square), suggesting that filtration was detrimental for the survival of ex vivo cultures independently of their media supplementation status.
borderline significantp=0.0801.6× alphagold
Tables 3 and 4 demonstrate that the dose response for PTC had borderline significant positive trend, with an ERR/Gy of 4.15 (95% CI −0.39 to 11.27, p=0.080); there were weak indications (p>0.4) that relative risk of PTC increased with increasing time since exposure and decreasing exposure age.
borderline significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Although no decrease in absolute PNIF values was found for the HVO exposures, we observed a statistically significant decrement in ΔPNIF during HVO NOx exposure compared to the FA exposure (− 18.1 L min −1 , p ≤ 0.001), and a borderline significant decrement during HVO PM+NOx exposure (− 7.4 L min −1 , p = 0.08).
borderline significantP = 0.081.6× alphagold
In the logistic regression analysis using continuous glucose values as predictors, the squared term was nonsignificant ( P curve = 0.46) and the linear association between postload glucose and the risk of LGA was weak and only borderline significant (OR 1.08 [95% CI 0.99–1.17], per 1 mmol/l increase in postload glucose, P = 0.08 for model 1; 1.07 [0.98–1.17], per 1 mmol/l increase in postload glucose, P = 0.13 for model 2).
borderline significantp =.081.6× alphagold
The findings of simple slope analysis show that the negative effect of proactive personality on the probability between the “symptoms-dominated but content” profile and the “flourishing mental health” profile was borderline significant at low levels of university environment (M -1SD; b = -0.39, SE = 0.22, t = -1.75, p =.08).