“borderline significant”

The effect of a history in siblings became borderline significant when adjusting for the history in fathers and mothers (HR: 1.51, 95%CI: 0.96-2.37, P =0.076).

However, this association was only borderline significant after propensity score matching (aHR 1.416, 95% CI 0.965–2.077, P = 0.076).

A borderline significant correlation was observed for higher 5′tRF‐Gly expression and poorly differentiated tumor (Table 1 , p = 0.076, χ 2 ‐test).

Vitamin D intake was higher in boys than girls, but the difference was only borderline significant ( P = 0.076).

In the cellist group, there was a borderline significant T2 Type × Lag interaction effect, F (2, 34) = 2.779, p = 0.076, η p 2 = 0.141.

In contrast, client-related burnout (CBI_3) showed a significant main effects model (F(2, 58) = 4.261, p = .019), driven by a borderline significant effect of occupational group ( B = 10.077, p = .076), with a non-significant interaction (Δ R 2 = .004, p = .625).

−0.0048±0.0007, though due to the limited number of cSNPs this result is only borderline significant (P = 0.076; Table 1 ).

pylori infection (11, 32.4% vs 0, 0%, p =0.03) and the increase in grade-I extent was borderline significant (9, 26.5% vs 0, 0% p= 0.076) in endoscopic findings.

However, patients with high levels of GOLPH3 expression retained only a borderline significant association with favourable OS compared to those with low levels of GOLPH3 expression (HR, 0.557; 95%CI, 0.292-1.062; P = 0.076, Additional file 2 : Table S2).

A borderline significant association was also found between CLL cell infiltration (≥50%) and IFTA ( P = 0.076).

Yet, a borderline significant decreased risk of T2D was observed for SNPs rs731710-A/G ( SLC7A5 ) and rs3783436-T/C ( SLC7A8 ) under a dominant model (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.51–1.03; p = 0.076 and OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48–1.04, p = 0.078, respectively). 3.3.

3 , and Table 1 ), in addition to borderline significant higher levels compared to stroma (VIP = 1.26, p ≤ 0.076, Fig. 2 f).

Angiotensin II correlated inversely and borderline significant with NT-proBNP only in the black hypertensives (see Table 2 ), (Spearman R = −0.472, p = 0.076).

A borderline significant association between PR and pCR ( P = .076), with an unadjusted odds ratio of 0.111 ( P = .061).

Besides, the variant T allele of rs11714045 located in NIT2 showed a borderline significant association with an increased risk of LUAD (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.10, P = 0.076).

The importance of semi-quantitative information on pneumococcal density in these analyses was further supported by a borderline significant association between baseline microbiota composition and density of pneumococcal colonization at day 2 ( R 2 = 1.7%, p = 0.076; Supplementary Table 3B ).

Compared to controls, LAGB was associated with reduced mortality [HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33–0.80, p = 0.003], significant in patients with diabetes [HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.94, p = 0.034], borderline significant in patients without diabetes [HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.35–1.05, p = 0.076].

In the analysis comprising CN participants, multivariate linear regression revealed that BMI was associated with memory composite score (β= -0.04, p = 0.038), Aβ42 (β= 0.016, p = 0.011), p-tau181 (β= 0.012, p = 0.014), and MMSE score with a borderline significant (β= -0.02, p = 0.076).

Notably, CA-IX expression was an independent predictor for high tumor stage and DFS ( P = 0.0047 and p = 0.0456, respectively), and was a borderline significant predictor for OS ( P = 0.0762).

Furthermore, four genes showed a borderline significant association: vitronectin ( VTN , adjusted P = 7.64 × 10 -2 ), the complement regulatory protein CD46 (adjusted P = 7.24 × 10 -2 ), coagulation factor II receptor-like 2 ( F2RL2 , adjusted P = 7.24 × 10 -2 ), and alpha-2-macroglobulin ( A2M , adjusted P = 7.64 × 10 -2 ) (Table 1 ).

3.2 Efficacy The primary endpoint analysis indicated a borderline significant difference of the mean CSMS(n) between the SCIT 50,000 AUeq/mL and placebo treatment groups in the ITT population ( p = 0.0767), with a treatment effect of −0.12 (95% CI, −0.26 to 0.01) points that fell short of the prespecified minimal clinically relevant difference of 0.25 points.

Interactions were borderline significant for smell, where estimated difference in cognition associated with moderate (β=−0.91, 95% CI: −1.91, 0.10, p = 0.077) and poor (β=−1.33, 95% CI: −2.77, 0.11, p = 0.071) smell was lower for NHB versus NHW participants.

However, the effect of age was borderline significant (P value = 0.077).

This correlation remained borderline significant after removal of an outlier in the yoga group (R 13 = 0.51, p = 0.077 for yoga group).

After adding these two indexes as adjusted cofounders, the predicting efficacy of hypertension and smoking weakened to the borderline significant level: hypertension (p=0.077) and smoking (p=0.071). 3.4.