“borderline significant”

We also identified borderline significant interaction between RDW values and cancer stage ( p =0.062), which was consistent with subgroup analysis based on cancer stage (early stages and progressive stages).

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses further confirmed that age (HR = 2.687; 95%CI = 1.156–6.244; P = 0.022) and EBV DNA (HR = 3.269; 95%CI = 1.383–7.728; P = 0.007) were highly significant prognostic factors for OS, and SUV max of patients with distant recurrence was borderline significant (HR = 2.415; 95%CI = 0.956–6.101; P = 0.062).

For miR-30a-3p, we detected a borderline significant association between low expression levels and the presence of lymph node metastases ( p = 0.062) and disease recurrence ( p = 0.065) ( Supplementary Figure 5B ).

In this study ANOSIM analysis indicated that temperature (global R value of 0.834; p = 0.001) was responsible for structuring the methanogen community but that substrate amendment was only borderline significant (global R value = 0.135; p = 0.062).

Survival analysis of the TCGA cervical cancer cohort revealed a borderline significant association between high SERPINB5 expression and reduced overall survival ( p = 0.062), suggesting a potential association between SERPINB5 upregulation and adverse prognosis (Fig. 5G ).

Multiple logistic regression analysis of other medical staff KAP scores Analysis for non-physician staff (nurses/technicians), adjusting for confounders, showed: Secondary hospitals approached significance for Practice (OR = 1.85, P = .062), 5 to 10 years experience was borderline significant for Knowledge (OR = 1.72, P = .084).

Interestingly, we noticed that there was a numerically higher trend for cumulative ratio of freedom from all-cause death in women compared to men with a borderline significant difference (P=0.062, no statistical significance, but close to significance) after performing propensity matching analysis.

EGFR was significantly up-regulated only by BDE-47 and not by BDE-209; in addition, a borderline significant down-regulation by MIX was noted ( p = 0.0621).

Hence, avalglucosidase alfa therapy is considered to provide better outcomes over alglucosidase alfa even though testing for superiority was borderline significant ( p = 0.0626) ( 60 ).

When combining the heterozygous 5A/6A and homozygous 5A/5A groups and comparing them to the wild-type 6A/6A, there was a borderline significant difference in the non-pterygium group ( p =0.0627, Figure 3 A), while a significant difference was observed in the pterygium group ( p =0.0065, Figure 3 B).

All exposures analysed significantly increased Saa3 levels compared to the vehicle control, with the exception of the 18 μg/mouse dose exposure to NM-400, which was only borderline significant (P = 0.0629).

40.3) was borderline significant (p = 0.063).

The number of previous treatment lines was prognostic for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.064-1.681; P = .0128), whereas the MIPI score was borderline significant (HR, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-3.78; P = .063).

In the model including CAT score and exacerbations, both had a borderline significant association ( P = 0.063).

They also had lower severity of depressive symptoms (borderline significant, P = 0.063), needed more time to complete the first part of the Stroop test ( P = 0.03), and had worse score on the first part of the VFT ( P < 0.001).

There was a borderline significant increase in the frequency average of total aberrations from three treated groups compared to that of the control ( p value = 0.063).

VREs were on average 175–215% more likely to appear in genomic regions with negative Tajima’s D values than expected, with H3K4me3 VREs showing a significantly greater frequency than TAS VREs ( P < 0.01, Student’s t -test) and a borderline significant increase over variable H3K27ac marks ( P = 0.063, Student’s t -test, supplementary fig.

The AFS-positive grade and radiographic score had borderline significant correlations with VEGF (Pearson correlation: 0.167 and 0.153, p = 0.063 and 0.091, respectively).

Although borderline significant (p-value=0.063), the Wilcoxon rank-sum test indeed highlighted a recent increase in the number of wild bird tests (on average >11,000/year pre-2020 and >22,000 post-2020), which indicates that the comparison of bird species diversity metrics should be interpreted with caution.

Although miR‐429 caused a borderline significant reduction in ZEB1 protein levels ( P = 0.063), both miR‐883b and miR‐205 increased ZEB1 protein levels (Fig. 7 f,g), supporting a role of miR‐883b and miR‐205 as positive post‐transcriptional regulators of hepatic ZEB1 expression.

Post hoc Dunnett tests comparing the experimental groups with the control group indicated a significant nocebo effect in the conditioning with verbal suggestion group ( p = 0.020), a borderline significant nocebo effect in the verbal suggestion group ( p = 0.063), and no significant nocebo effect in the conditioning group when compared with the control group (See Fig. 3 .).

Regarding psychosocial factors, self-stigma showed a graded effect in the unadjusted analysis, with high stigma significantly associated with relapse (OR = 2.37, p = 0.004), while moderate stigma was borderline significant (OR = 1.70, p = 0.063).

Using the Fisher r ‐to‐ z transformation, the significance of the difference between the two correlation coefficients was tested and yielded a borderline significant difference in strength of the correlation ( z = 1.53, one‐tailed p = 0.063).

LVM/BMI increased ( P < 0.01) in the HTDD+ group versus the control and in a borderline significant manner ( P = 0.063) in the HTDD+ group versus the HTDD− group (see Table 2 ) [these LAV and LVM results will be published in another article written from this multipurpose study: ( J Hypertens accepted for publication, 2014)]. 3.5.

HbA1C shows a borderline significant association with an OR of 1.386 (95% CI: 0.983–1.953, p = 0.063). 2.3.