“borderline significant”

In the WT -treated group, this effect was borderline significant ( WT vs. medium P = 0.06 ) ( Figure 3B ).

We found an inverse correlation between uEPX/c and FEV 1 ( r = −.20, P = .01) and a borderline significant correlation between uEPX/c and PD 20 methacholine ( r = −.15, P = .06).

The interaction term for age was borderline significant for the any pesticides ( p = 0.06) and fungicides ( p = 0.05) classes at the 5 % level of significance (data not shown).

Of note, the number of oligoprogressive lesions requiring treatment and the time between start of abiraterone or enzalutamide and RT treatment were prognostic factors for PCSS on univariate analysis, although the number of lesions treated was only borderline significant on multivariate analysis (p=0.06).

LADM and NSCD are significantly correlated (Spearman’s ρ = 0.66, P = 0.02), while the TCL correlates only in a borderline significant manner with either NSCD (Spearman’s ρ = −0.57, P = 0.06) or LADM (Spearman’s ρ = −0.52, P = 0.08).

There was a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.06) among the different ICIC units in perceived usefulness, but the scores in this dimension all revealed good satisfaction (5.5–6.2).

Though a bit higher (19.7% vs 17.0%), in the adjusted model there was a 20% borderline significant increase in seropositivity among participants who reported working (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.4, p = 0.06).

We observed generally consistent results when using CAC and ECC ≥75th percentile as dichotomous dependent variables, although statistical significance was restricted to CAC and ascending aorta for dietary calcium (adjusted OR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.45-0.98]) and adjusted OR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.46-0.99], respectively), and the association between dietary phosphorus and CAC became borderline significant ( P = 0.060) ( Table 3 ).

evaluated well-being using the general health dimension of the health questionnaire (SF-36) and found a borderline significant difference between the intervention and control groups (p = 0.06).

The increase in early breastfeeding was borderline significant in intervention areas ( p =0.06), while it was statistically significant in comparison areas ( p =0.01), but the endline proportions were not statistically significantly different between intervention and comparison areas.

Prior radiation therapy had a borderline significant effect on absolute and relative NCP progression in the full cohort (β=−70.9, p=0.06 and β=−4.5, p=0.29, online supplemental table S2 ) and among the cases (β=−101.5, p=0.06 and β=−7.8, p=0.08, online supplemental table S3 ).

In univariable analysis, the quantitative CE index had a borderline significant association with OS with hazard ratio (HR) = 2.7 (95% CI 0.96, 7.8; p = 0.06), but no significant association with PFS.

The association was borderline significant when adjusting for multiple confounding factors but with unchanged effect estimates (aHR, 2.50; 95% CI, 0.95–6.57; p = 0.06).

In Austria, Germany and Denmark, male patients had an immune response to IFNβ more frequently than females, this association between sex and ADA being significant in Austria and in Germany–Munich group (p < 0.01), and borderline significant for Denmark (p = 0.06).

While the naive correlation coefficient between the accidental poisoning and suicide trends over 1979–2011 was 0.72 suggesting a moderate-to-strong correlation, fitting a time series transfer function between the drug overdose and suicide series to assess their co-incidence yields a numerator regression coefficient (‘moving average’ term) significant at p =0.0311, and the denominator regression coefficient (‘autoregressive’ term) was borderline significant at p =0.0600.

After 4 h, this difference remained borderline significant: While M1 macrophages accumulated 12.6 ± 3.7 ng rifampicin/ng protein, M2 cells only exhibited 9.2 ± 3.9 ng rifampicin/ng protein ( P = 0.06).

Comparing EBRT with seeds, we observed a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.06) regarding maximum late gastrointestinal and a significant difference regarding genitourinary toxicity ( p = 0.06 and p < 0.001, respectively).

A proportional-hazards model regression analysis was performed to look at 2 nd -dose busulfan AUC as a continuous-variable predictor of relapse with non-relapse death as a competing risk; AUC was borderline significant at p=0.06.

There was a borderline significant reduction in EASI from week 4 to week 12 ( p = 0.06) and to week 24 ( p = 0.07).

The change in AvProg showed a borderline significant correlation with PGR expression ( r = 0.34, p = 0.06), such that the tumours with higher PGR expression showed a greater change in AvProg.

A borderline significant effect was found for the factor Hemisphere [F1,15 = 3.90, p = 0.06, ηp 2 = 0.20] and for the interaction between Display Type and Hemisphere [F2,30 = 3.06, p = 0.06, ηp 2 = 0.16].

Depression was only borderline significant ( p = 0.06), whereas GFD adherence and quality of life did not reach statistical significance.

When analysed by multiple regression, yoga treatment was found to be 10-fold (OR = 10.20, 95% CI = 0.69–174.19) borderline significant (P = 0.060) and ~8-fold (OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.02–33.49), statistically significant (P = 0.003), effective towards attaining the favourable composite ADA score 1 and 2, respectively (Table 2 ).

Conversely, there was a 16% borderline significant ( p = 0.06) reduction of vestibular asymmetry in the MST group as measured by the Head Shake Test but no change was observed in the group receiving the WT.

The interaction of the polymorphism rs3636536 within the VDR due to the functional relationship at 3 months after ending the therapy turned out to be borderline significant ( p = 0.06), while the correlation of pain intensity in rs4646536 with the genotype CC in rs11568820 ( VDR ) proved to be significant ( p = 0.02) [ 102 ].