Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.0601.2× alphagold
We observed generally consistent results when using CAC and ECC ≥75th percentile as dichotomous dependent variables, although statistical significance was restricted to CAC and ascending aorta for dietary calcium (adjusted OR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.45-0.98]) and adjusted OR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.46-0.99], respectively), and the association between dietary phosphorus and CAC became borderline significant ( P = 0.060) ( Table 3 ).
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The subgroup analysis revealed that the setting had no significant impact on screening tool performance (p = 0.58), but a borderline significant effect was observed for assessment tools (p = 0.06), although this result is limited by the small number of studies, with only one conducted in a community setting.
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The interaction of the polymorphism rs3636536 within the VDR due to the functional relationship at 3 months after ending the therapy turned out to be borderline significant ( p = 0.06), while the correlation of pain intensity in rs4646536 with the genotype CC in rs11568820 ( VDR ) proved to be significant ( p = 0.02) [ 102 ].
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Hence, mediation tests were used to determine whether depression influences the effect of childhood emotional abuse on the incidence of type 2 diabetes, showing a borderline significant Sobel Test (1.84, p = 0.06) and a significant Goodman Test (1.91, p = 0.05).
borderline significantP = 0.0601.2× alphagold
When analysed by multiple regression, yoga treatment was found to be 10-fold (OR = 10.20, 95% CI = 0.69–174.19) borderline significant (P = 0.060) and ~8-fold (OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.02–33.49), statistically significant (P = 0.003), effective towards attaining the favourable composite ADA score 1 and 2, respectively (Table 2 ).
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
IC resulted in a borderline significant reduction in time trial performance [0.31 (−0.60; −0.02), p = 0.06], heart rate [−0.13 (−0.27; 0.01), p = 0.06], rate of perceived exertion [−0.16 (−0.31; −0.00), p = 0.05] and borderline increased mean power output [0.22 (0.00; 0.44), p = 0.05].
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
However, Ins2 Akita mice that received ASC-CM demonstrated an overall reduction in GFAP immunoreactivity, yet, the data are only borderline significant when an outlier is excluded from the data (Akita-ASC-CM: 3.0 ± 0.5; Akita-Saline: 5.3 ± 1.0 integrated density/equal area; p = 0.06, Fig. 6b ).