“borderline significant”

At the low dose, an obvious but borderline significant ( p = 0.0589) shortening of the late life span is also noticed.

There was a borderline significant difference in the prevalence of HS in rs12979860 CC versus non-CC (40.8% versus 49.3%, P = 0.059).

54.6 ± 18.4, p = 0.024), while Bodily Pain (BP) showed a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.059).

Thirdly, A repeated-measures ANOVA of 2 (assessment: preintervention, postintervention) × 2 (group: own-age face intervention group, other-age face intervention group) × 2 (faces: child picture, adult picture) was used for the ocular interest area, as shown in Figure 4 . Results Whole-Map Eye Movement Index Analysis in Both Group Dwell Time The interaction between assessment and group type was borderline significant, F (1, 19)=4.6, p =0.059, η p 2 =0.31, and further simple effects analysis revealed that after the intervention, the same age face intervention group gazed at the pictures significantly longer than the other-age face intervention group ( p =0.045).

In contrast, in the per-protocol analysis 1, while no difference was observed in all incident fractures or MOF, a borderline significant reduction in hip fracture risk was observed in the screened group (169 vs 202 hip fractures, HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.67–1.01, p = 0.059).

Compared to 48 weeks before drug start, there was a borderline significant difference in the mean zBMI increase in the 48 weeks after drug start among those on TAF who switched from TDF ( p = 0.059); for other groups, the change in zBMI was similar before and after drug start ( p = 0.703, 0.253 and 0.971 for groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively).

The association between the specialty of healthcare workers with their attitude was found to be borderline significant (p=0.059).

Additionally, 11OHA4 levels were higher in serous cases, though this difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.059) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

There were no changes in levels of health system distrust over time (ie, time slopes were not significantly different from 0), except for a borderline significant increase in distrust in days 0–90 following the media exposure (0.002 per day, 0.18 over 90 d; P =0.059).

Logistic regression showed that only the T allele of the CRP rs3091244 and not any of the genotypes confers a borderline significant ( P = 0.059) increased MetS risk compared to A allele with the odds ratio of 1.70 (0.98–2.96).

Finally, glycosylated hemoglobin showed a borderline significant decrease ( P = 0.059), and LDL cholesterol a borderline significant increase ( P = 0.062).

Presence of neuropathy was borderline significant with p = 0.059 ( S7 Table ).

In the multivariable model using these variables, the adjusted r score was 0.27, and the strongest standardised regression coefficient was found for pain (-0.39, p=0.009), whereas age was only borderline significant (p=0.059).

The factor of gender did not reach significance (Wald χ 2 (1) = 2.477, p = 0.116), but the interaction of culture and gender became borderline significant (Wald χ 2 (3) = 7.456, p = .059).

Gait speed also did not increase after 14 weeks of training in both groups, although the difference was borderline significant for both ( p = 0.059).

Regarding sagittal preference, we found a borderline significant positive correlation between the TI and the CBI for proximity ( R (12) = 0.558; p = 0.059), whereas we reported no significant correlations for approach ( R (12) = 0.033; p = 0.919) and affiliative contacts ( R (12) = −0.073; p = 0.822) ( Figure 6 ).

Moreover, CCL11 was among the top core enriched genes with respect to angiogenesis in the non-inflamed UC mucosa, with a borderline significant upregulation (FDR; p = 0.059), but significantly upregulated in the inflamed UC mucosa, and present in a IBD GWAS loci.

Age had a borderline significant inverse association with IL-10 ( P = 0.059) whereby IL-10 was shown to decrease by about 1% when age increased by 1 year.

Between the AS and control groups: Age difference was borderline significant (p = 0.059) Gender distribution was significantly different (p < 0.001) However: Logistic regression or multivariate analysis was not performed ORs were not adjusted.

There was a borderline significant decrease ( p = 0.059) in WD-fed mice treated with vutiglabridin compared to the non-treated control ( Figure 4 E).

After adjustment for the GAP stage, this association was attenuated and became borderline significant (adjusted HR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.99–1.98, p = 0.059).

Interestingly, multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated a borderline significant positive association between LDHA expression and HBV DNA status in HCC tissues ( p = 0.059, Table S6 ).

Patients in both groups had high compliance to treatment applying treatment in 92.1% (SD 13.8) and 82.1% (SD 18.1) of possible days in the RIC group and the sham group, respectively, with a borderline significant group difference P =0.059.

24 Interestingly, the study by Speight et al (2021) showed a borderline significant result ( p = 0.059), 20 and others such as Lameijer et al (2021) and Ajjan et al (2023) found no significant HbA1c difference. 21 , 23 These mixed outcomes could reflect differences in follow-up duration, CGM usage adherence, intervention intensity, and participant characteristics. 25–27 For instan

In nonsmokers (never-smokers and ex-smokers) alone, age had a borderline significant effect on MF (p = 0.059), whereas gender was not significantly associated with MF.