Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
The association between elevated baseline LDH and shorter PFS on TT remained significant in the multivariate analysis adjusted for gender, age and stage (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00–1.27, p = 0.04), while it remained borderline significant for ICI (HR.1.42, 95% CI 0.99–2.05, p = 0.058).
borderline significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Viability was significantly reduced upon adding cisplatin at the IC 50 of the corresponding sensitive cell lines, ranging from 14% ( p = 0.012) to 18% ( p = 0.014) in NCCIT-R cells, and from 15% ( p = 0.019) to a borderline significant 13% ( p = 0.058) in 2102Ep-R cells for immediate and delayed sequencing, respectively.
borderline significantP = .0581.2× alphagold
Sex Analysis The effect of eluxadoline on QTcI intervals was inconsistent between men and women, with a single significant sex‐by‐treatment interaction at 15 hours following dosing ( P = .029) and 1 borderline significant interaction at 5 hours following dosing ( P = .058).
Evaluation of Eluxadoline Effect on Cardiac Repolarization.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev · 2018 · PMC6175186
borderline significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Also, we found an association with short-chain fatty acids (SCFAC2, F = 1.68, p = 0.00003; SCFAC3, F = 1.39, p = 0.002; SCFAC4i, F = 1.51, p = 0.0003; SCFAC4n, F = 1.26, p = 0.020); and borderline significant association with the Beck scale (F = 1.22, p = 0.058).
borderline significantP =0.05821.2× alphagold
The covariate-adjusted reduction in mean number of severe exacerbations for the roflumilast-treated group exhibited a borderline significant difference ( P =0.0582) and favorable comparison with the covariate-adjusted change in severe exacerbations for the non-roflumilast-treated group (parameter estimate, −0.1801; 95% CI −0.3664, 0.0062).
borderline significantp = 0.05831.2× alphagold
To better understand the driving factor involved with this difference, additional ratios were compared, including a neutrophil to T cell ratio that was borderline significant ( p = 0.0583), neutrophil to B cell ratio, neutrophil to CD8 + T cell ratio that was significantly different between groups ( p = 0.040), and neutrophil to CD4 + T cell ratio (Fig. 2b–e ).