Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
24 Interestingly, the study by Speight et al (2021) showed a borderline significant result ( p = 0.059), 20 and others such as Lameijer et al (2021) and Ajjan et al (2023) found no significant HbA1c difference. 21 , 23 These mixed outcomes could reflect differences in follow-up duration, CGM usage adherence, intervention intensity, and participant characteristics. 25–27 For instan
borderline significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
However, there was a significant effect of COMT genotype [ F (5.7, 155.16) = 3.18, p < .01, η 2 = .11] and a borderline significant effect of DAT1 genotype [ F (2.86, 166.02) = 2.57, p = .059, η 2 = .04] on changes in risk-taking behavior during the task. 5HTTLPR genotype was not significantly related to changes in risk-taking behavior throughout the task ( F < 1).
borderline significantP = 0.0591.2× alphagold
When original data were analyzed with validation data collected under identical conditions but naïve to the identity of interacting male lines, the dependence of focal male behavior on interacting male line was borderline significant (mixed-model binary logistic regression: n = 639, Z = 1.56, P = 0.059), and a nonsignificant interaction between line and block indicated that the tapping IGE was consistent across the two blocks (mixed-model binary logistic regression: n = 639, Z = 0.10, P = 0.458).
Detecting cryptic indirect genetic effects.
Evolution · 2014 · PMC4257566
borderline significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Breastfeeding, whether direct or expressed breast milk, showed a protective odds ratio against underweight, although this was only borderline significant (AOR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21–1.03, p = 0.059), while bottle feeding significantly increased the odds of stunting (AOR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.24–7.70, p = 0.015) ( Figure 2 ).
borderline significantp=0.0591.2× alphagold
In 2 trials (MLSPZV1 (Mali 1) (Mali, 2014) and MLSPZV2 (Mali 2) (Mali, 2016)), antibody levels were significantly higher in protected vs unprotected males and in one additional trial (EGSPZV3 (Equatorial Guinea, 2018)) the difference was borderline significant (p=0.059).
borderline significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Compared to 48 weeks before drug start, there was a borderline significant difference in the mean zBMI increase in the 48 weeks after drug start among those on TAF who switched from TDF ( p = 0.059); for other groups, the change in zBMI was similar before and after drug start ( p = 0.703, 0.253 and 0.971 for groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively).
borderline significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
For the domain ‘intervention characteristics’, which encompasses features of the intervention that could impact its implementation and uptake, and the domain ‘characteristics of individuals’, which includes individual-level factors, such as beliefs and knowledge that could affect implementation, [ 13 ] there was a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.059) with a preference for the in-basket over the BPA.
borderline significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
For PM 2.5 exposure, we could confirm two out of eight genes [ DNAJB5 (borderline significant, p = 0.059) and EAPP ] for men and four out of eight genes for women [ ARHGAP4 , PYGO2 , sirtuin 7 ( SIRT7 ) and Autophagy related 16-like 2 ( ATG16L2 )] (see Table S1).