borderline significancep = 0.052
The metastatic risk group demonstrated borderline significance ( p = 0.052).
The metastatic risk group demonstrated borderline significance ( p = 0.052).
In addition, loading of material was included due to its borderline significance (P = 0.052).
At baseline, the first eyes had worse BCVA than the second eyes with borderline significance (1.01 ± 0.61 vs. 0.66 ± 0.51, p = 0.052), but BCVA during the follow‐up did not differ between the eyes, including the final visits (0.85 ± 0.83 vs. 0.69 ± 0.60, p = 0.492).
hominis positivity included having past abnormal vaginal discharge ( p = 0.037), having current abnormal vaginal discharge ( p = 0.010) and a borderline significance ( p = 0.052), which were noted for previous pre-term delivery.
However, in the current study, the waist-to-height ratio of anthropometric index showed a negative trend with sperm concentration with only borderline significance ( p = 0.052) and a statistically inverse association with normal sperm morphology ( p = 0.004).
SPG performed better than LS, with borderline significance ( P =0.052).
No significant differences were found in FEV1 ( p = 0.227), while FVC showed a borderline significance ( p = 0.052).
Although smoking demonstrated borderline significance ( P = .052), consistent with its known role in impairing wound healing, it did not remain a significant factor in the multivariate analysis. 27 , 28 This may reflect high baseline smoking prevalence (70.8%) in this cohort.
Once the groups were familiarized with both methods, the HMD was still shown to be inferior to the TVM, with 48% longer completion times, although reaching borderline significance (133.8 ± 123.3s vs 90.6 ± 55s, P = .052).
Maximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions ≥3 predicted a decreased PGQ score (β = −6.39 [95% CI = −12.84 to 0.07]), with borderline significance ( P = .052) in participants with middle to high levels of pain; no significant prediction was seen in participants with low levels of pain.
Despite the lack of association between genotypes and TC, LDL-C, and apo B, concentrations of HDL-C and apo A1 in the CC group in rs2283228 were lower at the borderline significance level compared with the other 2 groups ( P = 0.052 and 0.055, respectively).
However, this difference reached only borderline significance ( P = 0.052) ( Figure 2B ).
Diameter stenosis ≥50% ( P < 0.001) and necrotic core volume ( P = 0.029) were independently associated with myocardial ischaemia, while total plaque volume showed borderline significance ( P = 0.052).
Portal venous phase washout (present vs absent) showed borderline significance (OR = 0.17, 95%CI 0.07-3.05, p=0.052), while arterial phase enhancement (present vs absent) was not statistically significant (OR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.71-1.32, p=0.812).
Unexpectedly, although with borderline significance ( p = 0.052), there was lower FREM2 expression in LGG patients who progressed during first-line temozolomide treatment and had an IDH mutation versus patients with IDH -mutant stable/responsive disease; whereas there was no difference in IDH -WT patients ( Figure 6 ).
While in GSE17537 , increased TIDE scores with borderline significance ( p = 0.052) could also be observed for high risk patients ( Supplementary Figure S12F ).
On the other hand Cox regression model did produce HR 2.552 CI95% 0.990 to 6.576 with borderline significance of p = 0.052.
The χ 2 test results showed a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of their majors ( P < 0.001), while there was a borderline significance in living expenses ( P = 0.052).
Smoking history (never, previous, and current smoking) correlated to blood cadmium (p<0.001), and with borderline significance to plaque cadmium/wet weight (p = 0.052).
Postoperative variables were similarly non-significant, although IV PRN morphine showed borderline significance (p = 0.052).
Additionally, the P50 amplitude from the PERG showed borderline significance (r = 0.237, p = 0.052).
The 1-min Apgar score and mean PNAs at the onset of any stage of ROP were lower in type 1 ROP with borderline significance ( P = 0.052 and 0.057, respectively, t-test).
At ≤6 months, MVI emerged as the dominant factor with a strong trend despite borderline significance ( p = 0.052), supporting the concept that very early recurrence primarily reflects pre-existing micrometastatic disease.
LPS) and borderline significance upon Up3 stimulation (1.2-fold ± 0.2, p = 0.052) (Fig. 2a ).
Diabetes was a condition with borderline significance ( p = 0.052).