“borderline significance”

Breastfeeding for more than 1 month approached borderline significance (OR=2.06, p=.051) in predicting AD and air filter use reached borderline significance in predicting protection from AD (OR=0.43, p=.053).

The negative correlation with central venous pressure at 72h had borderline significance (r p = -0,26, p = 0.051).

In the male-only analysis, this interaction was the top signal observed and the only one to reach borderline significance ( p = 0.051) among 11 candidates assessed ( Table 4 ).

Nevertheless, borderline significance ( P = 0.051) was achieved in favor of candesartan in the CHARM study after prespecified adjustments for covariates.

In Model 2, which additionally included metabolic parameters (HOMA-IR, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol), this association showed borderline significance (β = −0.121, p = 0.051).

The overall model indicated borderline significance (likelihood ratio test, p = 0.051).

Borderline significance was noted for the association between elevated creatinine ( p = 0.051) and CCI ( p = 0.062) with100% f T > MIC, while no associations were found for sex or lactate.

[ 17 ] Perianal disease was found to be associated with subsequent complications at a borderline significance ( P = 0.051).

Adjusted hazard ratios demonstrated elevated SCD rate for current users (HR 1.20; 95%CI: 1.04-1.44; p=0.02), recent users (HR 1.40; 95%CI: 1.12-1.73; p=0.002), and borderline significance for remote users (HR 1.20; 95%CI: 1.00-1.45; p=0.051).

Borderline significance was found for revision surgery ( p = 0.051) in this group EES-Q (domain) scores per level of control The median (IQR) EES-Q score reported by all patients was 19.17 (6.67–31.67).

The crude model had borderline significance (HR 2.26, P = .051), while propensity score–adjusted (HR 9.92, P = .002) and IPTW models (HR 13.98, P < .001) showed strong effects.

Age and BMI showed borderline significance ( p = 0.051 and p = 0.053, respectively), while other variables such as painless labor, AROM, oxytocin use, and Bishop scores at Propess lost significance after adjustment.

The answer choice “your employer or school” also had borderline significance between the ethnic groups such as white (M = 1.73, SD = 1.095, p = 0.051) and African Americans (M = 1.41, SD = 0.758), where the mean score of AA was mildly significantly lower than white.

The corresponding values for CD4 + T lymphocytes were 19/30 (63.3%), 7/16 (43.75%) and 1/7 (14.3%) respectively with borderline significance ( p = 0.051).

Collectively, both categorical and continuous measures of antibody levels were positively correlated with age and cumulative exposure for PvDBPII AH and PvEBPII (P<0.001–0.047), and PvDBPIII-V with a borderline significance (P = 0.051), but only in children free of P . vivax infection at enrolment ( Fig 2B and S1 Table ).

Low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), levels were significantly lower in CCHF patients compared to the control group ( p = 0.042), while high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C), levels were lower with borderline significance ( p = 0.051).

Statistical results revealed that only race exhibited borderline significance in survival time distribution differences (P = 0.051), while all other variables showed statistically significant differences in overall survival distributions (P < 0.05), highlighting the differential impact of these variables on patient survival.

By contrast, the between-stage difference in the MPP showed only borderline significance ( p = 0.051), and the magnitude of changes in the Gullstrand A/P and P/A ratios did not differ significantly between stages ( p = 0.203 and p = 0.208, respectively).

In the granulocyte compartment, both CD.I and UC.I patients displayed an increased proportion of basophils (adjusted P = .028 and < 0.001, respectively), and UC.I an increased proportion of neutrophils (adjusted P = .023), with a borderline significance for in CD.I (adjusted P = .051).

Multivariate OS analysis confirmed that karyotype was the only independent predictor of survival, however with only borderline significance ( p = 0.051).

Group 2 showed a decreased survival probability with borderline significance when compared with group 1 (group 1: n = 153, group 2: n = 34, HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.99 to 2.63, p = 0.051) ( Fig. 4 A and Table 3 ).

Although the presence of MvD showed a significant association with N95 amplitude (β = −0.815, p = 0.020), its association with P50 amplitude only showed a borderline significance (β = −0.428, p = 0.051).

Men reported low levels of support for FGC in response to the direct question, 8.3% (95% CI [5.4–11.1]) rising to 18.5% (95% CI [8.7–28.3]) in response to the UCT, (at borderline significance, p = 0.051).

A lack of PLND (HR, 0.401; 95% CI, 0.187 to 0.860; p=0.019), higher FIGO stage (HR, 1.625; 95% CI, 1.045 to 2.527; p=0.031), and LVI (HR, 2.280; 95% CI, 1.134 to 4.583; p=0.021) remained significant in the multivariate analysis, whereas PALN metastasis exhibited borderline significance (HR, 2.297; 95% CI, 0.995 to 5.303; p=0.051) ( Table 3 ).

Sex differences observed in the age-matched cohort were in the associations between e′ and BPs (p<0.05 for BPs with borderline significance in pulse pressure, p = 0.051 ~ 0.053), but not with SVRI and TAC, irrespective of adjustment for the aortic sizes.