Barely Significant
← all phrases

“barely significant”

876 sentences · 876 papers · 1,127 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

barely significantp = .0290.6× alphagold
Nonetheless, we are cautious in making strong inferences from the total reading data because: i) the observed effect was numerically small in magnitude; ii) only two-thirds of the participants showed this advantage in total reading times; and iii) the effect did not reach the significance level in the item-analysis –note that the effect was barely significant (p = .029) when using a linear mixed model analysis for this comparison; and iv) the effect did not occur for total reading times or gaze durations at the local (word) level.
barely significantp = .030.6× alphagold
Of the three alleles tested, only 4a7a, a putative regulatory mutant, males showed a barely significant difference (p = .03) from non-mutant control flies ( CyO balancer) of the same cross indicating that the dominant enhancement (silencing) is dependent upon chromosomal location and not on the w + transgene Pci construct itself ( Figure 4 ).
barely significantp = .030.6× alphagold
Although the similarity of correlation maps was barely significant only in group statistics [t(9) = 2.55, p = .03 after z transformation], the average correlation coefficient was very small ( r = 0.017, Fisher's z = 0.017), with negative correlation values in two of the participants (Table 1 ). 3.4 Larger‐scale functional organization of the striatum Previous stud
barely significantp<0.030.6× alphagold
On the other hand, the results of cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma for each group separately exhibited non-significant differences in the TC by means ofPearson Chi-square tests: mutuality (X2(1, n = 54) = 0.84, p<0.4); cooperation in the three decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 1.20, p<0.3); total of cooperative decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 1.38, p<0.3); cooperation in the first decision (X2(1, n = 54) = 1.92, p<0.2); cooperation in the third decision (X2(1, n = 54) = 0.991, p<0.4); and barely significant differences in some measures of cooperation in the NTC, such as cooperation in the three decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 5.129, p<0.03); and total of cooperative decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 5.84, p<0.02).
barely significantp = 0.030.6× alphagold
Using the multivariable time-dependent mixed model we found that, patients on antihypertensive and antihyperlipidemic monotherapy, those that reach the deductible limit are slightly (barely significant) more adherent than those that have not yet reached the deductible limit, with a relative adherence ratio (RAR) of 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00–1.05, p = 0.03) for antihyperlipidemic therapy and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00–1.04, p = 0.05) for antihypertensive therapy.
barely significantp=0.0360.7× alphagold
The ROC analysis shows a poor performance for total distal acid exposure [Area under the curve (AUC)=0.597, p=0.179] and a marginally better and barely significant finding with total proximal acid exposure (AUC=0.651, p=0.036) in patients with aspiration of refluxate.
barely significantp = .0400.8× alphagold
Importantly, the addition of Rape Myth Acceptance significantly weakens the impact in the model of all previously significant variables except Age (see the comparison of χ 2 in omnibus test before and after Rape Myth Acceptance inclusion in Table 2 ), and in particular renders insignificant RWA (OR: 1.017 [0.971, 1.065], p = .475) and years of education (OR: 0.975 [0.933, 1.018], p = .244), while it leaves the SDO variable barely significant and having negligible effect (OR: 1.051 [1.002, 1.101], p = .040).