Barely significant correlations/anticorrelations are observed with POS (R = 0.72, p = 0.029) and NHE (R = −0.70, p = 0.036).
← all phrases
“barely significant”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
Nonetheless, we are cautious in making strong inferences from the total reading data because: i) the observed effect was numerically small in magnitude; ii) only two-thirds of the participants showed this advantage in total reading times; and iii) the effect did not reach the significance level in the item-analysis –note that the effect was barely significant (p = .029) when using a linear mixed model analysis for this comparison; and iv) the effect did not occur for total reading times or gaze durations at the local (word) level.
The Word Position effect was significant in condition D ( χ 2 = 27.4, p < 0.001) but only barely significant in conditions A ( χ 2 = 4.7, p = 0.03) and B ( χ 2 = 4.2, p = 0.04)—unimpressive significance levels that do not withstand a multiple-comparison correction.
In the present study, ORR is barely significant [RR = 1.22; 95% CI [1.02 to 1.46]; P = 0.03].
Of the three alleles tested, only 4a7a, a putative regulatory mutant, males showed a barely significant difference (p = .03) from non-mutant control flies ( CyO balancer) of the same cross indicating that the dominant enhancement (silencing) is dependent upon chromosomal location and not on the w + transgene Pci construct itself ( Figure 4 ).
The difference in translocation in the presence of TCEP was not significant, in the presence of copper, the defect in translocation was barely significant (p = 0.03).
Although the similarity of correlation maps was barely significant only in group statistics [t(9) = 2.55, p = .03 after z transformation], the average correlation coefficient was very small ( r = 0.017, Fisher's z = 0.017), with negative correlation values in two of the participants (Table 1 ). 3.4 Larger‐scale functional organization of the striatum Previous stud
On the other hand, the results of cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma for each group separately exhibited non-significant differences in the TC by means ofPearson Chi-square tests: mutuality (X2(1, n = 54) = 0.84, p<0.4); cooperation in the three decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 1.20, p<0.3); total of cooperative decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 1.38, p<0.3); cooperation in the first decision (X2(1, n = 54) = 1.92, p<0.2); cooperation in the third decision (X2(1, n = 54) = 0.991, p<0.4); and barely significant differences in some measures of cooperation in the NTC, such as cooperation in the three decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 5.129, p<0.03); and total of cooperative decisions (X2(1, n = 54) = 5.84, p<0.02).
Using the multivariable time-dependent mixed model we found that, patients on antihypertensive and antihyperlipidemic monotherapy, those that reach the deductible limit are slightly (barely significant) more adherent than those that have not yet reached the deductible limit, with a relative adherence ratio (RAR) of 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00–1.05, p = 0.03) for antihyperlipidemic therapy and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00–1.04, p = 0.05) for antihypertensive therapy.
Even for MKi67, it was barely significant ( p = 0.032) whereas the other subtypes were more significant ( p < 0.001).
The interaction terms are barely significant in the random effects model (p = .032).
a slight trendgold
There was a slight trend for NS units’ gain to be reduced by visual stimulation, but this trend was both small and only barely significant (median 0.982; Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p = 0.036).
The ROC analysis shows a poor performance for total distal acid exposure [Area under the curve (AUC)=0.597, p=0.179] and a marginally better and barely significant finding with total proximal acid exposure (AUC=0.651, p=0.036) in patients with aspiration of refluxate.
Furthermore, the resistance data among all 180 lines at 2 μg/g α-amanitin and 0.2 μg/g α-amanitin revealed a weak and barely significant correlation (r = 0.13, p = 0.037) ( S3 Table ).
The most remarkable difference was observed for parietal GM at a Z-threshold of −4.5, but this difference was barely significant (AUC amyloid-negative CN reference group = 0.689, AUC amyloid-negative and –positive reference group = 0.593, DeLong’s Test p = 0.039).
Testing for trend across low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk strata was barely significant ( P = .039).
However, the ratio was only 1.5:1 (26.9% versus 18.0%) and multivariate analysis found female gender, with Exp(B) = 1.3, to be only barely significant ( P = 0.039).
We found a correlation, though barely significant, between a lower BMI and the risk of major bleeding (26.7 vs. 27.2, p = 0.0399). 3.3.
They reported a barely significant (p<0.04) improvement over chance performance data that they chose not to plot; however, their assay was still not significantly different from animals not fed iron that migrated in the presence of a magnet.
Importantly, the addition of Rape Myth Acceptance significantly weakens the impact in the model of all previously significant variables except Age (see the comparison of χ 2 in omnibus test before and after Rape Myth Acceptance inclusion in Table 2 ), and in particular renders insignificant RWA (OR: 1.017 [0.971, 1.065], p = .475) and years of education (OR: 0.975 [0.933, 1.018], p = .244), while it leaves the SDO variable barely significant and having negligible effect (OR: 1.051 [1.002, 1.101], p = .040).
In this line of reasoning, we find that the frequency of combined Class I and III PGCs does not differ between wild type and Ror2 in graded SCF (p = 0.23) and is barely significant in static SCF (p = 0.04).
In leptonema we counted 20.6 foci per Esco2 fl/∆ Vasa-cre − control cell (±25.8 SD; n = 19) and 38.5 foci per Esco2 ∆/∆ Vasa-cre + cell (±38.0 SD; n = 37), a difference that was barely significant ( P = 0.04).
No or barely significant ( p = 0.04–0.21) correlations existed for HADS, STAI X-1, and STAI X-2 scores.
As for the mostly inattentive group, the Pearson’s Chi-squared test with Yates’ continuity correction showed barely significant results, (χ 2 (1) = 4.4, p = 0.04).
However, at far they were barely significant (T = 74, p = 0.04).