Rz1.2-5A presented a difference at the margin of statistical significance (p = 0.058) compared with the control.
← all phrases
“at the margin of statistical significance”
Sighted at
p<0.07
In the literature
Under light-adaptation (ambient illumination), while R1-R6s of both genotypes exhibited significant improvements in their image resolution ( D wild-type = 9.81 ± 3.7%, D hdc = 14.85 ± 6.95%), the difference between the two groups decreased and was at the margin of statistical significance ( Appendix 6—figure 6E ; p=0.058, t-test).
Furthermore, Table 3 shows higher incidence rates at the margin of statistical significance for not complicated diabetes (2.52% vs. 0.61%, p = 0.059) and gastrointestinal diseases (7.04% vs. 3.41%, p = 0.062) including GERD (5.54% vs. 2.33%, p = 0.052) in the HZ cohort.
In addition, the relationship of SPON2 expression with stage was at the margin of statistical significance (χ 2 = 7.446, p = 0.059).
An interesting fact, however, was the presence of a difference in ∆EDSS at the margin of statistical significance ( p = 0.06 ), between these groups after a period of approximately 5–9 years after the start of therapy.
LA area and LVIDD were at the margin of statistical significance ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.05, respectively).
By 1 week after the initiation of differentiation (7 days after the start of NGF, exposure to 5 μM CPF for the final 3 days), there was a small decrement in DNA content at the margin of statistical significance ( p < 0.06) and no change in viability as assessed with trypan blue staining ( Figure 4A ).
3b ), statistical analysis revealed a significant increase of total Aβ in frontal cortex ( p = 0.009) and an increase at the margin of statistical significance in the hippocampal area ( p = 0.06).
For this parameter, 1 μM Ag + evoked a small increment at the margin of statistical significance ( p < 0.06), whereas 10 μM Ag + evoked a more substantial, significant increase; this means that, for both treatments, cells formed before we added Ag + survived longer than those generated in the presence of Ag + .
At this time point, a difference in tumor volume was observed between the vehicle group and the combination group at the margin of statistical significance ( P = 0.062).
Compared to the NC group, the concentration of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in serum was increased significantly in HD and decreased in LG at the margin of statistical significance ( P = 0.0692) ( Fig. 3b ).
Compared to age-matched DMSO-treated fish, EDA-treated fish exhibited higher (although at the margin of statistical significance ( p = 0.07) GFP protein levels ( Figure 6 b).
Figure 2 shows the weak overall trend in SOM, increasing by approximately 0.5% per year, though with substantial variance and at the margin of statistical significance ( R 2 = 0.25; p < 0.07).
The total T‐scores of the SRS‐2 were negatively correlated with the change in executive functioning accuracy in the RW group and at the margin of statistical significance, τ = −0.41, p = 0.07, n = 11, but not in FB ( p = 0.62).
Statistically significant variables (p < 0.05) and those at the margin of statistical significance (p < 0.07) were included in the logistic regression model.
Among male marriage migrants, asking for fair treatment had negative association with poor self-rated health (OR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.36, 1.04) at the margin of statistical significance ( p = 0.071).
In Table 1 and Figure 2b , the protective potency of the mixture was more effective compared with therapeutic, and the protective group showing p value at the margin of statistical significance ( p < .075) close to being statistically significant (Dahiru, 2008 ).
The indirect effect via TNFSF18 was at the margin of statistical significance (β indirect : 0.054, 95% CI: -0.006 to 0.115; OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.99-1.12; P = 0.077) and was estimated to account for 47.0% of the total causal effect, indicating a potential role for the GITR-GITRL signaling pathway in H. pylori -driven carcinogenesis.
The impact of the place of residence remained at the margin of statistical significance (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99–1.22; P = 0.08), suggesting a potential trend that warrants further investigation.
There were no items statistically significant with suicidal ideation, but “lack of reward” was at the margin of statistical significance (p=0.083).
The paediatric consultation rate showed a positive association of small magnitude, at the margin of statistical significance (IRR = 1.001; 95% CI 1.000–1.003; p = 0.086), whereas SMC activity was not statistically associated with reported incidence (IRR = 0.989; 95% CI 0.955–1.024; p = 0.525).
An additional analysis of the peak-to-peak amplitude between P200 and N200 components revealed significant difference between the “citrus” and “water” conditions: t = 2.679, p < 0.05, while the differences between “vanilla” and “water” were at the margin of statistical significance: t = 1.754, p = 0.086.
PGS WHRadjBMI association with pancreatic cancer was at the margin of statistical significance (OR[95%CI] = 1.047[0.99–1.104], P = 0.086).
Surprisingly, after the second dose of vaccine (V3), higher SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response levels were observed in SARS-CoV-2-naïve subjects with solid cancer at the margin of statistical significance ( p = 0.092) ( Table 3 ).
In Italy, it had no significant effect on P (AME = 0.001; p = 0.59) and was at the margin of statistical significance for CD (AME = 0.003; p = 0.098) (see Table 1 , columns 1–2 and 5–6).