Barely Significant
← all phrases

“at the margin of statistical significance”

78 sentences · 78 papers · 198 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In contrast, patients with severe forms of CAD such as LMCAD had a stronger association with 9p21 than patients with obstructive CAD without LMCAD (OR 1.22, CI 1.01–1.48), even though it must be noted that these results were at the margin of statistical significance (p = 0.042; Figure 2 , Table 6 ).
The reducing HbA1c effect of Tai chi was better than that of other aerobic exercises, but the difference was at the margin of statistical significance [MD = −0.19, 95% CI (−0.37, 0.00), P = 0.05]; compared with nonexercise, Tai chi had the effect of reducing 2 h postprandial blood glucose [MD = −2.07, 95% CI (−2.89, −1.26), P = 0.0002], there is no significant difference between Tai chi and other aerobic exercises in reducing 2 h postprandial blood glucose [MD = −0.44, 95% CI (−1.42, 0.54), P = 0.38].
The study also found a negative effect of school meals on boys aged 9–15 y, although the result was at the margin of statistical significance ( P = 0.05) and was not confirmed in the robustness analysis, suggesting this finding was of a spurious nature.
The results of morphological traits like dimensional characteristics, peel percentage and hue angle variations were robustly linked at the margin of statistical significance ( p < 0.05) to the different locations and tree age as indicated in ( Tables 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 ; Figs. 1 and 2 ).
kg/m 2 in BMI change and 0.335 kg in body weight change during the 2-year follow-up ( P = 0.002 and 0.01), a decrease of approximately 0.23 kg/m 2 in BMI change during the 3-year follow-up ( P = 0.01), and a decrease of approximately 0.23 kg/m 2 in BMI change during the 4-year follow-up, which was at the margin of statistical significance ( P = 0.05).
2 ), the small group of patients who died during the follow-up period ( N = 7) had a neoadjuvant HMGB1 profile pattern mirroring that of a positive DMFS event, with decline during NACT before reverting during CRT, both alterations at the margin of statistical significance ( P = 0.053 and P = 0.049, respectively).
, a German population cohort study which also found an increased deeper periodontal pocket with higher BMI (OR = 1.6, BMI increase by 5). 36 In this study, education level was at the margin of statistical significance (p = 0.053), as in a previous study which showed association with education, tooth loss, and oral hygiene. 18 Tooth loss and oral hygiene were not related to increased BMI in this study, may be because the lowest remaining teeth was 14 teeth as an inclusion criteria while in that study, there was no particular inclusion criteria based on tooth loss.