“at the limit of significance”

Budding and the presence of cell nests is at the limit of significance. 4.

At the limit of significance, it should be noted that 71.4% of team members consider their knowledge of the design and conduct of validation tests, safety tests, and pre-clinical and clinical trials to be an important item and have regular or good knowledge (p = 0.088).

However, the spatiotemporal model revealed a lower correlation between the two entomological indicators: the regression coefficient decreased and remained at the limit of significance (mean: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.00–1.24).

The adjusted HRs for males compared to females were significant in Austria (1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.9) and Denmark (1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.7), at the limit of significance in Germany-Dusseldorf (1.4, 95% CI 0.9–2.0) and not significant in Sweden (1.0, 95% CI 0.7–1.3) ( Table 3 and Fig 4 ).

In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of toxicities was associated with OS, but BMI was at the limit of significance.

Also, Test 3.Sm yields a significant result whilst the Test 2.CL result is at the limit of significance.

Actually, only the association with underprivileged neighbourhoods in the [791–1166 €/CU] income group was at the limit of significance (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = [0.96-4.80]).

Progesterone production in response to histamine stimulation was independent of dose at the limit of significance, but histamine had no effect on progesterone release.

The vaccination adherence motivated by their IBD was at the limit of significance (1.72 (0.99–2.97)) Table 4 .

An increase in ECP levels at the limit of significance was observed in patients with elephantiasis ( 100 ).

However, IL-1ra treatment showed only a little protection, and often the data were not significant or at the limit of significance, probably due to an insufficient dosage and a relatively long injection interval.

Extremely breast density was at the limit of significance (RRR = 1.58; 95% CI:1.00–2.49).

9.1%, p = 0.05), but at the limit of significance.

, at the limit of significance) relative loss of Fe was detected.

Post hoc comparison showed significant differences between ERICA scores of 0 and 2 (t = −3.8, p tukey = 0.004) and a result at the limit of significance between ERICA scores of 1 and 2 (t = −2.5, p tukey = 0.057), in the direction of an increase in BAI linked to the increase in ERICA scores (0 = mean 5, sd = 4.30; 1 = mean 11, sd = 5.86; 2 = mean 22.33, sd = 12.95) ( Figure 2 ).

They were the lowest for HDL-P or total and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46–0.79] and HR = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.46–0.86], respectively) and the highest and at the limit of significance for HDL-C (HR = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.55–0.92] and HR = 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53–0.99] respectively).

Although significant differences were not observed for some concentrations (for 8 and 16 μg/mL, they are at the limit of significance), the increase in these concentrations was at least 0.6 times greater than that of the control; therefore, this increase is important enough to discuss.

Two recent primary studies on children presenting with RA confirmed the superiority, even if at the limit of significance, of the azelastine-fluticasone association compared to the steroid alone in the control of symptoms [ 96 , 97 ].

0.15 μm/min 2 ), which means that this value is highly variable and at the limit of significance.

As regard the migrant’s status (refugee or asylum seeker), the efficacy of the treatment on the depression showed a significant effect only for the status of refugee, whereas the effect was at the limit of significance with null degree of heterogeneity for the state of asylum seeker.

The difference with regard to fibronectin-coated ABMs was at the limit of significance.

Association between PM 2.5 , BC and NO 2 and stroke Results of the multivariable logistic regression models showed a significant association between stroke and PM 2.5, while associations with NO 2 and BC were at the limit of significance (Table 3 ).

The prevalence of diabetes was 17.6% (95%CI 14.9;20.6) in 2003 and 20.1% (95%CI 17.3;23.1) in 2008, which indicates a growth over this period (p at the limit of significance).

10.0%; p = 0.067), being at the limit of significance and showing a risk almost three times higher than in punctures not located in the area fissure (OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 0.9–8.6).

However, the same analyses in the case of PEA, retinol and beta-carotene resulted underpowered, at the limit of significance in case of BMI and FFA, and had sufficient power in the case of AEA, 2AG, SAFA and PA/LA.