Further, significant improvements in reaction time were also found in the SRA during the 2- and 3-back tests and approaching significance in the STEP ( p = 0.05) for the 3-back.
← all phrases
“approaching significance”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A negative correlation, approaching significance, was found between DE and LUS at T1 ( p = 0.05).
HIV-infected participants showed significantly lower adherence to the intervention, approaching significance ( p = 0.05).
the 1 lb (0.45 kg) mouth weight was approaching significance ( p = 0.05) with the biceps having a lower T-score.
However, unadjusted analysis between “high cannabis use” and having experienced five or more ACE was significant for men with OR 2.37 (95% CI: 1.30–4.28, p = 0.005) and appear to be approaching significance for women, with OR 2.01 (95% CI: 0.99–4.08, p = 0.05).
However, they were approaching significance (close to p = 0.05) in the main analysis.
Revision HVC were associated with fewer cardiac complications (p=0.040) and older HVC with less wound disruption, approaching significance (p=0.050), but also more hemorrhage (p=0.040).
Similarity ratings for the nose ( M = 3.70, SD = 0.64) were also close to the scale mid-point, although this difference was approaching significance, t (19) = 2.09, p = .050, d = 0.47.
(2) We still found that PECTI longer than 13 weeks had higher ECOG assessment with an approaching significance (P = .05) compared to PECTI shorter than 9 weeks, which might indicate that fitter patients received therapy more quickly and then had better survival outcomes.
Interleukin 10 (IL-10) was detectable in many of the mice treated with HER2 T-BsAb but was highest in the two highest dose groups ( Figure 7C ) , with the 3 μg group being significantly higher compared to the no treatment control (p = 0.0003) and the 10 μg group approaching significance (p = 0.05).
Approaching significance was the lability index ( p = 0.05) from the CGM data.
This reduction was significant at 1 hpi and approaching significance at 24 and 72 hpi ( p ≤ 0.05, p = 0.1, p = 0.09) ( Fig. 8 a).
However, the finding that caregivers tended to rate more interference due to fatigue than did youth was approaching significance [ t (198) = −1.94, p = .05].
Mean power output: β ranged from 0.22 to 0.30, approaching significance ( p = 0.05–0.11).
( 2022 ) used asynchronous delivery and found that improvements in wellbeing from pre to post for girls, was approaching significance ( p = 0.05), but pre-post changes were non-significant for boys ( p > 0.05).
α and γ-metrics were also related to axonal density, with correlations approaching significance, and P < 0.05 for Mγ, Aα and α par .
Subgroup-specific estimates revealed a modest benefit for biological augmentation (MD = 3.65) versus a non-significant deficit for structural (MD = −2.53), with the interaction test approaching significance (Q = 3.83, df = 1, p = 0.050), indicating potential superiority of biological approaches at this interval, though tempered by high within-group variability.
Expectation-outcome discrepancies were associated with reduced weight loss approaching significance (t = −1.99, df = 58, p = 0.05) and significantly lower likelihood of hypothetical surgical reconsideration compared to participants reporting expectation-outcome congruence (t = 2.51, df = 58, p = 0.01).
All female linkage groups were longer and had longer map intervals between markers than male linkage groups (t-tests of map intervals approaching significance for 13 linkage groups with P <0.05 and 11 with P <0.01 without Bonferroni correction).
The differences approaching significance (p = 0.05–0.1) are shown directly in the graph.
After controlling for differences in BMI category, boys who identified as a racial/ethnic minority had a lower SF-36 social functioning domain score compared with White, non-Hispanic boys, with this difference approaching significance ( P = 0.05).
In the BA/AA subgroup, the best fitting model included age, education and ADI only ( R 2 = 0.47, χ 2 = 9.06, p = 0.02), with education approaching significance as an individual predictor (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.21 – 1.01, p = 0.05).
There were also trends approaching significance at 4 and 6 weeks ( p = 0.05, p = 0.09).
When comparing AT and UC groups at 9-month follow-up, the mean difference was approaching significance, -1.05m/sec (95%CI -2.11 to 0.017, p = 0.05).
From baseline to 12 months, there was a mean improvement in Fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) scores approaching significance (0.26 ± 0.38, 95% CI: 0.003,5.12; p = 0.05) and true significant improvement in mean NFS (2.78 ± 0.92, 95% CI: 2.16, 3.40; p < 0.001).