The content of complex IV followed the same pattern in which old mice showed lower content than young mice, with the difference between the young and PS groups only approaching significance ( P = 0.06).
← all phrases
“approaching significance”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Analysis of the median split data for number of movements revealed neither a significant effect of Condition ( p = 0.234) nor an interaction effect between Group and Condition ( p = 0.389), with only the effect of Group approaching significance ( p = 0.060).
With RET, there was a main effect of time (P < 0.001) (interaction: P = 0.3) with a significant increase in MPS in PLA (1.44 ± 0.09%.d −1 (P < 0.01, 95% CI [0.11, 0.48], d = 1.13) and approaching significance with n-3 PUFA (1.44 ± 0.072%.d −1 (P = 0.06, 95% CI [−0.005, 0.37], d = 1.20).
Meanwhile, middle-to-higher-income Latino(a) parents, in comparison with White parents, reported significantly more changes in appreciation of life (95% CI Mdifference [0.16, 1.25], p < 0.01), improved relationships (95% CI Mdifference [0.16, 1.13], p < 0.01), and new possibilities (95% CI Mdifference [0.15, 1.16], p < 0.01), as well as more changes in personal strength that was approaching significance (95% CI Mdifference [−0.02, 1.12], p = 0.06).
Mean age at injury in males was lower (30.2, 95% CI 29.1–31.324) than in females (35.4, 95% CI 32.4–38.4) with this difference approaching significance (Students t-test, p = 0.06).
The model included positive associations with arsenic (approaching significance at p-value < 0.06) and lead, and negative associations with Hb concentration and vanadium.
Three of the BCM tested for their association with development of a PF were approaching significance—abdominal volume ( p = 0.06), visceral adipose tissue volume ( p = 0.1), and volume of muscle at L3 ( p = 0.08).
While the mean total vergence range was marginally higher in naïve adults compared to preschoolers and infants, this effect was only approaching significance (1-way ANOVA, F [2,42] = 2.86, P = 0.06).
Living with children aged between 12 and 17 vs living alone during the first lockdown was associated with an increase in symptoms of anxiety at 12-months follow-up (ß = − 4.50, 95% CI = 1.13 to 7.88) (model approaching significance at p = 0.060).
Although there was no statistically significant difference between FAQ, LIST, or CONTROL groups on readiness to act on colorectal cancer risk at study end, a difference approaching significance ( P =.06) suggests the need for further research.
The independent-samples t -tests showed a difference in inhibition time between the two groups, approaching significance at T1, t (36) = −1.91, p = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.62.
Differences between the groups on general diet were approaching significance (p = 0.06), all other comparisons between the three groups were not significant.
Notably, scores for this subgroup were higher overall in the HOT compared to the CONTROL trial (main effect for trial approaching significance; p = 0.06), with moderate to large ES found between trials at baseline, 60, 90 and 120 min ( d = 0.83 [-0.17, 1.75] to 1.81 [0.64, 2.81]).
As sample size was a little small for the acute ACOM comparison, we also ran a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, which was also nonsignificant (before correction) but approaching significance ( z = −1.89, p = .06).
Although not reaching full statistical significance, there was a notable difference of opinion on the effect of smoke between males and females in these three conditions, approaching significance ( p = 0.06 by the Chi-square test). 3.7.
In addition, scores on the engagement subscale were correlated with the amount of time spent on the app, with a P value approaching significance, ( r =0.142; P =.06 for n=180).
[ 10 ] Some have debated that surgery can be avoided in older patients, [ 11 ] despite a meta-analysis finding a poorer OS approaching significance, P = .06, and a significant poorer progression-free survival, P = .0001.
Post‐LPS FAIR ASL liver perfusion response differences were observed between sham/BDL rats ( P = .02), approaching significance in sham (+78 ± 33 ml/min/100 g; P = .06) but not BDL rats (−49 ± 40 ml/min/100 g; P = .47).
In the women sample, a significant effect of conscientiousness on pop-out versus conjunction search was revealed, F (1, 38) = 4.15, p = .050, η 2 = .12. The follow-up of the significant interaction with a sex-split (compare groups) MANOVA with conscientiousness as a dichotomous between-subject variable as expected showed no significant effects of conscientiousness in men, p s > .162, while in women, the three-way interaction of pop-out versus conjunction by target absent/present by conscientiousness was approaching significance, F (1, 38) = 3.77, p = .060, η 2 = .09.
Using two-way ANOVA, a difference in strain is approaching significance in the secretory phase [ F (1, 36) = 3.7, p = 0.06] with no effect of IL-6 and no interaction.
Control IntCB 1 +/+ mice displayed robust preferences for WD when compared to SD, an effect largely absent in IntCB 1 −/− mice by 3 h ( Figure 5 a, from 92.8 ± 2.8% total kcals from WD in IntCB 1 +/+ mice compared to 46.5 ± 12.5% in IntCB 1 −/− mice; p = 0.029), and approaching significance during the 3–6 h interval ( Figure 5 b, from 96.2 ± 3.8% total kcals from WD in IntCB 1 +/+ mice compared to 46.9 ± 16.5% in IntCB 1 −/− mice; p = 0.06).
Values approaching significance were found for Galectin-3 concentrations, with higher concentrations observed in the female group ( p = 0.060) ( Table 7 ). 3.
PGLYRP4 exon 2, c.37A>C Ile13Leu, exon 6 c.575G>T Gly188Val, and exon 9, c.*416A>C, UTR variants may associate with CD or with gender in CD patients PGLYRP4 exon 2, c.37A>C, Ile13Leu (SNP rs30006458), was differentially distributed in CD females compared with CD males and the AA genotype was approaching significance ( P = 0.06, Table S16 ).
While we saw a similar protective effect of the rs3755468 mutation in our cohort, this effect was approaching significance in men (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47–1.01, p -value = 0.06) but not in women (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.61–1.14, p -value = 0.24) in the opposite of the previous study.
Our results did not show a significant difference in OV between patients and the controls, although it was approaching significance ( P =0.06).