Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approaching significance”

2,641 sentences · 2,641 papers · 3,385 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

approaching significancep = 0.0581.2× alphagold
A total of 73 patients (33.80%) presented with angiographic vasospasm in the non-alcohol abuse group, and 11 patients (55.00%) presented with angiographic vasospasm in the alcohol abuse group, with the p -value approaching significance ( p = 0.058).
approaching significancep = 0.0581.2× alphagold
The relationship between mind wandering in the three segments of the meeting before the idea generation segment and noticing who contributed the idea was in the expected direction (i.e., more mind wandering leads to less noticing), however, the result was only approaching significance (b = − 0.12, SE = 0.07, p = 0.058).
approaching significancep = .0581.2× alphagold
In addition, planned comparisons indicated that although there was no difference between the groups at the low load conditions (set size 1 and 2, p values >0.4), there was a significant difference in the d ′ of the two groups at set size 6, t (26) = 2.141 p = .042, and the difference at set size 4 was approaching significance, t (26) = 1.983 p = .058.
approaching significancep = 0.0581.2× alphagold
None of the treatments affected ENS frequency in triploids in the two other experiments (Tables 2 and 3 ), although acclimation temperature was approaching significance in Experiment 2 ( p = 0.058). 4 DISCUSSION Our study investigated whether rearing conditions, i.e. acclimation temperature or oxygen level, followed by acute aerobic stress, affect ENS frequency in diploid and triploid fish using brook charr as the experimental model.
approaching significancep = 0.0581.2× alphagold
While the only previous study comparing self-reports on the SWEAA between autistic females and males did not find a significant difference between 30 autistic men and 36 autistic women on the Mealtime surroundings subscale, the difference between the groups was approaching significance (p = 0.058) (Spek et al., 2020 ), and the nonsignificant result might have reflected lack of power.
approaching significancep = 0.05811.2× alphagold
Significant type 3 tests of fixed effects for gender: F (1, 482) = 6.09, p = 0.0139, age: F (3614) = 6.62, p = 0.0002, group: F (2, 576) = 16.92, p ≤ 0.0001, time: F (1584) = 5.79, p = 0.0164, and approaching significance for race/ethnicity: F (3, 457) = 2.51, p = 0.0581.