Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approaching significance”

2,641 sentences · 2,641 papers · 3,385 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

approaching significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Among participants who participated/reported session, there was a significant negative correlation between intervention length and changes in 30-second sit to stand scores (r = -.82, (p = 0.044)) and the relationship between intervention length and time for both the five repeated chair stands and gait speed from the SPPB were approaching significance (five chair stands: r = -.80 (p = 0.057); gait speed: r = -.77, (p = 0.075)).
approaching significancep =0.05771.2× alphagold
Possible Determinants of GL-ILD Treatment Considering GL-ILD treatment as criteria to subdivide our cohort, we did not identify any CT finding differentially distributed between treated and untreated patients (only the presence of lower field consolidations had a p -value of approaching significance, p =0.0577), nor any baseline lung function parameter.
approaching significancep = 0.0581.2× alphagold
A total of 73 patients (33.80%) presented with angiographic vasospasm in the non-alcohol abuse group, and 11 patients (55.00%) presented with angiographic vasospasm in the alcohol abuse group, with the p -value approaching significance ( p = 0.058).
approaching significancep = 0.0581.2× alphagold
For when the case type was guilty, for judges there was an effect of rating [ F (2, 64.3) = 3.503, p = 0.036], but no evidence for a CF, rather a situation where Prob ( B ) > Prob ( A&B ) (M ProbB = 9.543, SE ProbB = 0.250; M ProbA&B = 8.831, SE ProbA&B = 0.276, marginally approaching significance, p = 0.058, d = 0.612) (Taylor, 2015 ).
approaching significancep = .0581.2× alphagold
A nonsignificant interaction effect that was approaching significance was found for the Contemplation subscale (F = 3.761, df1 = 1, df2 = 51, p = .058; corrected R 2 = .051; post hoc: high Trauma Load T = −2.097, df = 26, p = .046; low Trauma Load T = .462, df = 25, p = .648).
approaching significancep = 0.0581.2× alphagold
The relationship between mind wandering in the three segments of the meeting before the idea generation segment and noticing who contributed the idea was in the expected direction (i.e., more mind wandering leads to less noticing), however, the result was only approaching significance (b = − 0.12, SE = 0.07, p = 0.058).