Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significanceP = 0.05881.2× alpha
All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS (SAS Institute 1999 ) Results Acaricidal activity of essential oils Mortality due to treatment with 34 essential oils and the number of eggs laid by the females treated with those oils did not differ significantly ( P < 0.05) from the control (2.9%), although it approached significance ( P = 0.0588) (Table 2 ).
approached significancep = 0.05881.2× alpha
Tissue viral loads were assessed on day 5 postinfection, with pixatimod-treated animals showing a significant 3.1 log 10 -fold reduction in viral titers in nasal turbinates ( p = 0.037, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, nonparametric data distribution) and a 4.6 log 10 -fold reduction in viral titers in the brain, which approached significance ( p = 0.0588, t test, parametric data distribution).
approached significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
In pathology subgroup analysis, IDC group demonstrated a significant breast symmetry score change with p = 0.008 and IDC/ILC group exhibited changes in breast symmetry scores and nipple-to-IMF distance that approached significance ( p = 0.059 and p = 0.063 respectively).
approached significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
Over the same period, the change in MagD/Magnitude (MagD/Mag ratio) from baseline for eyes randomized to receive negative periocular pressure was also higher (+ 0.14 versus − 0.16), compared to the control eyes, approached significance ( p = 0.059).
approached significanceP = 0.0591.2× alpha
An ANOVA comparing the GLMM version of the more complex First Choice of Platforms Model (with previous experience as focal in the current study, proportion of trials where the focal encountered a dominant competitor, presence of a dominant competitor within 25 m included as fixed effects, and identity of the focal individual included as a random effect) with a null model using only the focal’s identity (included as a random effect) as a predictor, found differences between the models that approached significance based on a likelihood ratio test ( P = 0.059), and an increase in deviance of 7.428, suggesting that the First Choice of Platforms Model had a better fit than did the null model.