Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significancep = .071.4× alpha
Having comorbid (elevated) anxiety symptoms at baseline associated with more severe symptoms (t 525 = 2.15, p = .03; estimate: 3.00 ± 1.39), and the association for elevated depressive symptoms at baseline approached significance (t 525 = 1.79, p = .07; estimate: 2.54 ± 1.42).
approached significanceP = 0.071.4× alpha
The condition × myopia outcome interaction approached significance (amp F = 3.19, P = 0.07, all others P ≥ 0.06), indicating that although children who remained emmetropic may have slightly greater binocular–monocular differences in amp, lag, and AR, but overall, binocular facilitation was preserved in children who later became myopic.
approached significanceP = .071.4× alpha
151 Similarly, in a trial evaluating BRDC risk in 24 groups of calves entering a retained ownership program, 149 the association between BVDV1 antibody titer at arrival and protection against BRDC approached significance ( P = .07), and low BVDV1 or BVDV2 titer at arrival was associated with several performance outcomes.
approached significancep = .071.4× alpha
The same regressions as above indicated that (1) days-at-school was a better predictor when pitted against age (respectively, p = 0.04 and p = 0.70, r 2 = 24%); and (2) none of the above 4 cognitive variables were better predictors than days-at-school although backward digit span approached significance ( p = .07); and (3) the same conclusion was reached when reading speed was pitted against days-at-school (respectively, p = 0.88 and p = 0.02; r 2 = 24%).
approached significancep = .071.4× alpha
The main effect of group approached significance, F(1, 46) = 3.46, p = .07, η P 2 = .07 (words recalled: CM group = 6.00, Control group = 7.04, and there was a main effect of retention interval, F(1, 46) = 67.26, p<.0001, η P 2 = .60 (immediate recall = 7.44 words, delayed recall = 5.60 words), but group did not interact with retention interval (p = .71) (see Figure 2 ).