“almost significant”

Interactions The sex difference in association between change in lung function and C pn serology was statistically significant for FEV1 (p interaction = 0.04) and almost significant for FVC (p interaction = 0.08).

In the multivariate analysis, CAN remained almost significant after adjusting for the prognostic risk factors for CAN and the decline in the renal function, and an interaction with proteinuria was found.

In males fed increasing concentrations of FB 1 , an almost significant linear decrease in average daily gain was observed.

The use of the term “partially significant” or “marginally significant”, where the P value is almost significant (e.g.

In turn, the almost significant frequent-initial preference observed when exposed to misaligned cues could suggest that infants detected the incongruence between the auditory and visual facial cues (or at least were unable to integrate the facial cues in any way), and hence ignored the unreliable visual information and segmented the language based on the cumulative and more stable auditory sources of information, as found in certain instances with adults [ 46 – 47 ].

Fisher’s exact test still gave no reason to reject the null hypothesis ( p = 0.198), but the binomial proportion test yielded an almost significant p-value of 0.0171, showing some evidence that the risk of myocardial injury after SARS-CoV-2 infection might be lower than after mRNA-1273 vaccination.

To identify the most influential independent factors in the appearance of GIF a multivariate analysis was performed with all significant and almost significant variables from the univariate analysis that has been included in a backwards-stepwise model of binary logistic regression, with the condition that those whose p is less than 0.05 remain in the final model and more than 0.15 are removed.

This model confirms the significance of preoperative tumor volume, and shows CRET as almost significant.

T and N tumor staging in this study were almost significant when examined using univariate analysis, but the association became insignificant when examined with logistic regression analysis.

Interestingly, an almost significant boomerang effect emerged for insincere apologies, as participants in the low-sincerity group displayed lower forgiveness levels than those in the no-apology condition, t (172) = –1.79, p = 0.075, d = –0.33 (see Figure 1 ).

According to the regression model, there was an almost significant negative interaction between FTND score and machine-measured nicotine yield (Table 2 , lower).

In this sense, despite we observed almost significant differences in the level of Δ-VEGF-A in reactor vs. non-reactor goats, more work needs to be done to understand the role of this cytokine in cTB.

Modulation of the ARN after ‘high’-intensity exercise The significant interaction effect in the ARN was driven by an almost significant increase of rs-FC after the ‘high’-intensity exercise condition and a decrease after the ‘low’ exercise condition in the right anterior insula.

Immunofluorescence analyses of synaptic puncta indicated that IL-6 led to a significant reduction of the density of pre-synaptic puncta and colocalized puncta, and an almost significant defect in the post-synaptic puncta ( Figures 6 I‒6L).

Finally, postmenopausal women who ever used hormone replacement therapy showed a decreased CC risk (OR = 0.44; 95%CI = 0.24–0.78) and almost significant decreased RC risk (OR = 0.51; 95%CI = 0.24–1.07).

Also, a similar study that analyzed a larger sample of Spinster foci for female receptivity also found brain regions that did not reach statistical significance but had ratios that could be intuitively interpreted as almost significant like ours.

This means there was an almost significant difference in how much the navigation times varied between the two conditions.

This is associated with a significant increase in the risk of bleeding (2.5% versus 1.6%, p<0.001) and an almost significant increase in mortality from any cause.

In patients with an intubation of more than five days, reintubation due to UAO obstruction was higher in placebo group than dexamethasone group, with almost significant differences (Table 2 ).

There were also almost significant differences in movement in the similar period in 3PP0 condition compared to 1PP condition.

In this case, we detected an almost significant difference comparing the number of severe reactions out of the total number of reactions in the two groups (VE = 4/9, VC, 0/4; X 2 = 2.568, df = 1, P Exact(2-tails) = 0.120, P 1-tail = 0.069), particularly assuming a 1-tail test, given the expectation is that the VC vaccine is more effective than the VE one.

In the distressed sample we obtained similar results as the ones obtained when considering the whole sample with almost significant p-values after correcting for multiple comparison, potentially due to the smaller sample size (Table S01 – Supplementary Material).

On the other hand, the difference of -18 ms ( p = 0.313) obtained for control muscles in four of five RG1 rats and the difference of 1 ms ( p = 1.0) for control muscles in the RG2 rats was not significant, while the difference of -21 ms ( p = 0.026) obtained for muscles with SNC in the RG2 rats was almost significant ( S8 and S9 Tables).

It should be noted, however, that the difference between treatment conditions in the presence of ADD/ADHD was almost significant: somewhat more children met the criteria for this disorder in the CAU condition as compared to the PMTO condition.

As interaction between infection status and cadmium were significant for all biomarkers (almost significant for metallothionein), we described below biomarker results according to this interaction.