“almost significant”

The interaction term between HIV status and oleic acid in quartile regressions ( Table 5 ) was lower than p = 0.100 for both WAZ and BAZ regressions and almost significant for the HAZ regression ( p = 0.101), hence differences in growth between HIV groups was explored in relation to oleic acid quartiles in Table 6 .

The feeling of annoyance was almost significant ( p = .102), individuals in class 1 being more annoyed compared to other classes (39.13%).

This biggest amount of cells is due to the enhancement of circulating MCs (H 3 = 9.286, p = 0.025; Dunn-Test post-hoc TG 2M vs WT 2M p = 0.04; TG 2M vs TG 4M p = 0.05), an almost significant increase in monocytes (H 3 = 5.97, p = 0.11; Dunn-Test post-hoc TG 2M vs WT 2M p = 0.06; TG 2M vs TG 4M p = 0.03; TG 2M vs WT 4M p = 0.05) and, although not significant, to the general increase of all immune cells considered ( Table 2 ).

The relationship between SOFA score and ECLT remained significant in the non-septic patients (r = 0.45, p = 0.01) and was almost significant in the septic patients (r = 0.39, p = 0.11).

A correlation between PRx and both CBFica was almost significant (p = 0.112 and p = 0.137).

Almost significant ( p = 0.11741) was the frequency of isolation of C. tropicalis in the Surgery department (panel a).

However, we did find an almost significant difference for TrpN, with an increase in children with moderate impairment (389.13 vs. 528.14; p = 0.13).

This finding was almost significant (p = 0.15).

Interestingly, when survival data was stratified by cancer stage ( Supplemental Figure 2 ), significant or almost significant differences were detected between mSEPT9 -positive and -negative subjects in stage III of CRC ( p = 0.15), GC ( p = 0.047), EC ( p = 0.071), and HCC ( p = 0.265); and in stage IV of CRC ( p = 0.052), but not in stage I and stage II.

Before the PSM analysis, there was an almost significant difference in tumor size and tumor location between the two groups ( P = 0.172 and P = 0.057).

All variables that were found to be significant or almost significant (P<0.20) in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis.

354.08 ± 262.19; with statistical significance p = .014) and almost significant for gastrointestinal score (167.69 ± 174.79 vs. 347.55 ± 320.95; p = .247).

In comparison to the municipal council area, people in rural areas were also more likely to be vaccination hesitant, only in the adjusted model (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.00–1.79; P = 0.05) which was almost significant, but not in the univariate analysis (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.86–1.40 P = 0.46).

Likewise, Model 3 did not improve fit despite an effect of SNS that was almost significant, χ 2 (2, N = 190) = 1.38, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.15, p = 0.50.

There was a significant increase in common c-IMT in group B at 24 months (p = 0.048); the difference was almost significant in group A (p = 0.53).

Post hoc general linear models controlling for sleep onset and maintenance problems at t1 found no effect of presence of recurring memories ( F (1, 32) = 0.08, p =0.78) on later sleep onset and maintenance problems at t2, but an almost significant influence of presence of hypervigilance ( F (1, 32) = 4.05, p =0.53).

In the following analysis, an almost significant difference was found when comparing the respondents of the genQ who joined an AVI and who did not (X 2 = 0.365; p = 0.546), but no difference was found comparing the words elicited by the respondents in the preQ and in the genQ (considering who did not join an AVI) (X 2 = 1.711; p = 1.191). 4.3.

In the probe test rmTBI mice spent less time in the goal zone compared to shams, which was almost significant ( p = 0.55, Mann–Whitney U Test) (Fig. 2 c).

We observed an increase of patients going back home with a trend test almost significant ( p = 0.57) and a chi-squared test that is statistically significant between 2010 and 2012 ( p = 0.002).

21 Outcome data Two large randomized trials (DEFINE-FLAIR, n = 2492; iFR-SWEDEHEART, n = 2037) showed the noninferiority of an iFR vs an FFR-guided PCI strategy during follow-up at 1 year and 5 years, although iFR showed lower revascularization rates with almost significant P values. 31 , 32 The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 18.6% (iFR) vs 16.8% (FFR) ( P = .63) after 5 years in deferred patients who presented with stable angina (n = 611) or nonculprit lesions of ACS (unstable angina and NSTEMI, n = 297).

The range of RGS in DNA-diploids was relatively narrow (Table 1 ), with an almost significant increase towards the east (latitude: r s = −0.154, P = 0.804; longitude: r s = 0.872, P = 0.054; Fig. 2 F, Fig.

In Malta, UC showed an almost significant increasing trend, but no significant trend in CD was observed[ 138 ].

Considering such almost significant reduction in waist circumference, despite increases in body mass, could indicate that the dance training may have led to accretion in lean mass, which was also supported by the qualitative results, where several participants reported experiencing increased muscle strength over the study period.

dizziness, hypotension, syncope) for alfuzosin, terazosin, doxazosin and almost significant for tamsulosin [ 71 ].

No significant pairwise differences could be detected, but the differences between Le Perroquet and Westhoek ( P : 0.0554) and between Westhoek and Ter Yde ( P : 0.0601) were almost significant ( Fig. 2 , Table S3 ).