“a trend towards significance”

Outcomes are presented as "mean ± SEM." The significance thresholds for statistical analyses are characterized as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001, with values in the range of 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 denoting a trend towards significance.

Of note, this was the first GWAS in neuroblastoma to evaluate an African American cohort, confirming predisposition SNPs in HACE1 and identifying a trend towards significance for those in LIN28B .

Only geographic region of origin achieved statistical significance while there was a trend towards significance for the proportion of patients recently ( S2 Table ).

In breast carcinoma patients, a low CMG2 mRNA expression was also correlated with a worsened overall survival rate (relative risk RR = 1.35, see Figure 4 a); however, this result showed only a trend towards significance.

The Melbourne Assessment improved with a medium effect size accompanied by a trend towards significance.

Patients showed higher levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (1.6 ± 0.3 vs 1.4 ± 0.3) and glucose (4.9 ± 1.2 vs 4.3 ± 0.5) (all p <0.05), and a trend towards significance in insulin (5.7 ± 3.4 vs 4.4 ± 1.7) and HOMA-IR (1.1 ± 0.7 vs 0.85±0.3).

Moreover, the median life expectancy and lower respiratory infections rate showed a trend towards significance.

However, there was a trend towards significance within the gain context (impulsivity: β = 1.78, t = 1.74, p corrected = 0.083, 95% CI = [− 0.24, 3.81]; compulsivity: β = 2.11, t = 1.91, p corrected = 0.083, 95% CI = [− 0.06, 4.29]; interaction: β = − 2.05, t = − 1.85, p corrected = 0.083, 95% CI = [− 4.23, 0.14]) for error trials.

NHAs displayed a significant increase in RAD51 expression after radiation injury; a trend towards significance for upregulation of RAD51 was also observed in MSCs (Fig. 6 A and B).

Results In general, the occurrence of secondary neoplasia among our patients was significantly ( p V = 0.035) associated with a positive family history of malignancy and with disease duration; a trend towards significance was observed in patients aged > 50 years.

There was a trend towards significance in several categories.

Another study that included 9 patients with a point mutation (Arg403Gln) in the beta-myosin heavy chain gene found significantly reduced PCr concentrations and CK flux while the PCr/ATP ratio showed a trend towards significance [ 41 ].

On univariate analysis of the factors affecting LRFS, patients of age <45 years had 5 year LRFS of 80% compared with 100% in patients ≥45 years, this difference had a trend towards significance (p 0.06).

The total FCI score showed a trend towards significance in Model 1, but this effect became non-significant in Models 2 and 3.

Another pattern to note is the greater association of crystallized intelligence (the ability that is acquired throughout life: i.e., knowledge, facts, and skills) with the brain‐based sex, as well as GPSs for cognitive capacity, compared with fluid intelligence (the ability to reason and solve problems in novel situations; a trend towards significance).

Among these factors, DOI was significantly associated with the T-stage (P-value <0.001 by the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test) and showed a trend towards significance with LVI (p-value of 0.09 by the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test test).

With regard to radiographic features of joint space narrowing and subluxation, there was a trend towards significance; but for other features such as subchondral sclerosis, subchondral cysts, and erosions, the heritability was nonsignificant.

The lack of a significant reduction in frontal power at day 28 may be due to the study being underpowered to detect more subtle, sustained change given that the effect showed a trend towards significance.

Regarding parents consanguineous in marriage, the P -value of 0.056 indicates a trend towards significance but does not meet the conventional threshold (0.05).

Many values showed a trend towards significance that could be completed and confirmed with a bigger sample.

A p value < 0.05 was considered significant and values > 0.05 but < 0.20 were considered a trend towards significance (for hypothesis-generating purpose).

However, there is a trend towards significance at the later time points (weeks 24 and 52) ( Table 3 ). 3.4.

Results are presented as mean ± SEM, and the statistical significance difference was declared at p < 0.05, and 0.05 < p < 0.10 was considered as a trend towards significance.

Women with GDM had significantly higher fasting ( p < 0.001) and 1 h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ( p < 0.01) glucose concentrations compared to women without GDM, while 2 h OGTT ( p = 0.07) glucose concentrations showed a trend towards significance.

51 The results of the study showed that the interaction between menopausal status and ASM was not strictly statistically significant, with a P value of 0.061, indicating a trend towards significance ( Table S1 ).