“a trend towards significance”

The Cox proportional hazards model indicated a trend towards significance (p<.10) for the association between the use of an LPIVC and CF.

Results are reported as means for abscessed bulls v normal bulls (mean, lower and upper 95 per cent confidence limits) and were considered statistically significant when P<0.05 and a trend towards significance when 0.05 < P<0.10.

Transfection of [m6A1]miR-494-3p resulted in a significant increase in mRNA expression of LRP6 and AVCR1 and a trend towards significance ( p < 0.1) of FGFR2 and FZD2 compared to its unmethylated equivalent, indicating a decrease in target repression after [m6A1]miR-494-3p transfection ( Figure 6 B,E–G).

The variables found significant or showing a trend towards significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.

2D and E ) although a trend towards significance in the sigma band was evident in wake periods (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.10, F = 2.72, df = 1, Fig. 2G and H ).

In addition, a trend towards significance ( p < 0.1) was observed in the positive correlation (r = 0.7489) between parameters a* and b* ( Table S1 ).

Significance was set at P ≤ 0.05, and a trend towards significance at P ≤ 0.10 was seen.

Factors with a trend towards significance (p < 0.10) were included in a multivariable regression analysis.

Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis of cancer-specific survival showed a trend towards significance in ER-negative patients (P<0.1) and was significant in triple negative patients (P<0.05).

Five participants showing a trend towards significance (amplitude >0; p < 0.1) were included.

The asterisk indicates a significant between-group difference (p < .05) and the star a trend towards significance (p < .10), whereas the additional symbols denote significant relationships between the graph measure and either general intelligence or processing speed at the corresponding sparsity (p < .05).

Significance was considered at p ≤ 0.05, and a trend towards significance was considered at p ≤ 0.10.

A trend towards significance was set at p < 0.10.

Regarding drug dependence, mean differences were not significant at a 95% probability level but showed a trend towards significance ( p < 0.10).

A trend towards significance (T) was considered at 0.05 < P <0.1.

All variables found to be significant and factors that showed a trend towards significance (p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.

The analysis showed that the drought treatment explained 61.96% of the total variance in community structure (R 2 = 0.6196), showing a trend towards significance (F = 6.515, p = 0.100) ( Figure S1 ), though the statistical power was limited by sample size.

A trend towards significance ( p < 0.1 corrected) between MWF and VDQ was found in right temporal WM postcentral gyrus, and supramarginal gyrus.

Variables that showed a trend towards significance (p < 0.1) in the univariable regression were then added to a step-down multivariable logistic regression model to determine independent predictors of ICH.

For multivariate analysis (MVA), factors showing a trend towards significance (p-value < 0.1) with respect to their impact on OS in UVA were taken.

Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05 and a trend towards significance was declared at 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10.

Significance level was set at p < 0.05, with a trend towards significance being accepted at p < 0.1.

Differences were declared significant at p < 0.05 and considered a trend towards significance at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

The tumor site ( P = 0.065) and PLR ( P = 0.089) both showed a trend towards significance (0.05 < P < 0.1).

A trend towards significance was observed for AVH distress ( p < 0.1).