“a trend towards significance”

Repeated measures ANOVA revealed improved performance from baseline to follow-up on a non-trained test of visual WM (p < .01) and a trend towards significance on a verbal WM task (p < .10).

When looking at the adult GIs (78.3%, n = 36/46) compared to pediatric GIs (100%, n = 10/10) there was a trend towards significance with the adult GIs tending to feel less adequately trained ( P = 0.10).

Therefore, we also examined the stratified effects and Bonferroni-corrected confidence intervals of interaction terms where there was a trend towards significance (p<0.1) or theoretical potential for effect modification.

However, a trend towards significance ( p < 0.1) was observed from vaccination to 3 wpv in the L-NV group (r = −0.53) and from vaccination to 5 wpv in the H-V group (r = −0.53). 3.3.3.

In the Belgian SENIOR study, which compared characteristics of 211 nursing home residents who had falls within 1 year of follow-up vs 354 who did not fall, among 12 frailty tools considered, the Groningen indicator was the only one with bivariate significance (p<0.05), and SHARE-FI was the only with a trend towards significance (p<0.10, frailty more prevalent in fallers: 29% vs 27%); however, when 1-year mortality was considered in the same cohort (93 deceased vs 491 not deceased), SHARE-FI had the best discrimination (p=0.01, frailty more prevalent in the deceased: 55% vs 39%)[ 59 ].

Students unpaired t-tests were performed with significance set at P < 0.05 and a trend towards significance at P < 0.1.

The p -values were grouped into three categories: p ≤ 0.05 was considered “significant”, p > 0.05 and ≤0.10 as “a trend towards significance”, and p > 0.10 as “not significant”.

By multivariate logistic regression analysis, the death of COVID-19 patients with diabetes is positively correlated with age and CRP ( p < 0.05), and has a trend towards significance with fasting blood glucose ( p < 0.1).

The 3-way interaction (action × person × fixation position) showed a trend towards significance (F 1,6 = 2.7, p = 0.1).

The eccentric peak torque of the flexor (REF) showed a trend towards significance at t (6) = − 2.03 ( p = 0.10), and the eccentric peak torque of the extensor (REE) showed a significant difference at t (6) = − 4.41 ( p < 0.05).

For all analyses, the significance was set at p < 0.05, and a trend towards significance was noted when p < 0.1.

All parameters significantly associated with CMD ( p < 0.05) or showing a trend towards significance (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) were included in a forward Selection (Wald) multivariate logistic regression analysis.

The correlations between Aβ AI and cognitive test results in the CN-Aβ- or pAD-Aβ + groups did not reach or show a trend towards significance ( p > 0.1).

Origin showed a trend towards significance ( P < 0.1), women with a foreign descent seem to have lower expectations.

All differences were considered significant when p < 0.05, and a trend towards significance was noted when 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1.

Statistical significance was set at 5% and a trend towards significance accepted for P < 0.1.

Similar to the analyses conducted for the entire cohort, we assessed the impact of TERT muts upon adjustment for all parameters that showed significance or revealed a trend towards significance ( p < 0.10) in the univariate analysis (age, NF1 mutational status, TP53 mutational status, number of mutated genes per tumor, and MGMT promoter methylation status).

Statistical significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and as a trend towards significance when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

Multiple logistic regression (using automated backward variable selection) was performed including those clinical parameters that showed at least a trend towards significance in univariate analysis (cut-off p-value = 0.1) using SPSS 15.0.

ONL thickness was associated with an increase in PWS with 0.060 dB/μm at an eccentricity of 5.2° ( p < 0.001), while EZ thickness only showed a trend towards significance (0.017 dB/μm at an eccentricity of 5.2°; p = 0.1).

After 20 minutes of exercise, a trend towards significance was observed compared to before exercise ( p = 0.1) No effect of exercise duration was detected for VA (Table 2 ; p > 0.05).

Moreover, 8 out of the 16 DEGs showed statistically significant changes (one tail t -test, P < 0.05) and 3 showed a trend towards significance (one tail t -test, P < 0.1) (Fig. 6 D ).

The effect of group showed a trend towards significance, F (1, 58)=2.78, P =0.10, ƞ p 2 =0.05.

The significance was set at p < 0.05, and a trend towards significance was considered for 0.05 < p < 0.1.

Statistical significance was accepted at p ≤ 0.05, with a trend towards significance being accepted at p ≤ 0.1.