Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend towards significance”

2,761 sentences · 2,761 papers · 3,605 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend towards significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Results for all groups are presented in Table 1 . Subjects who received the highest dose of CPL-01 in Cohort 3 had a mean (SD) AUC 0-72 of 286.8 (113.70), which was the lowest value for any treatment group in all cohorts, showing a trend towards significance as compared to the pooled placebo group (mean AUC 0-72 of 369.2, p = 0.08) and numerically lower than the mean (SD) AUC 0-72 of 322.5 (176.63) for the pooled NAROPIN group.
a trend towards significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Multivariate survival analysis, limited by small numbers, demonstrated a trend towards significance for cytotoxic chemotherapy as an independent predictor of mortality with a HR 1.93 (95% CI: 0.93–4.00, p = 0.08), while the other individual treatment modalities were not associated with significant differences in COVID-19 mortality ( Table 2 ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
11 The multicenter, randomized FAST trial explored the effect of low-dose prednisone and intravenous (iv) CYC for 6 months, followed by maintenance AZA in SSc-ILD. Compared with placebo, predicted FVC in the treatment group improved by 4.2%, but only with a trend towards significance ( p = 0.08) after 12 months. 17 Due to potential bladder toxicity, continuing CYC long-term is challenging.
Immunomodulatory treatment of interstitial lung disease.
Ther Adv Respir Dis · 2022 · PMC9364223
a trend towards significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Correlation between PMNs mobilization and CXCL1 plasma levels was also evaluated and we found a clear significance (r = 0.66, p = 0.001) when animals of all groups were included (n = 28) and a trend towards significance (r = 0.71, p = 0.08) when only ischemic animals were evaluated (n = 7) (Data not shown).
a trend towards significancep-value = 0.0811.6× alpha
The comparison of the weighted average degree showed that both PD-CN and PD-MCI patients presented a lower number of connections compared to controls (PD-MCI = 172.6; PD-CN = 175.2; controls = 183.7), which showed a trend towards significance in the comparison with PD-CN (p-value = 0.081) and was statistically significant in the comparison with PD-MCI (p-value = 0.027).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0811.6× alpha
We next assessed the expression levels of CD3ζ in CD4 + and CD8 + T cells in PBMCs: statistically significantly lower CD3ζ MFI in CD4 + T cells from patients before treatment (15.4±0.6) was observed as compared to controls (20.0±1.3, p = 0.0008); higher CD3ζ MFI in CD4 + T cells that shows a trend towards significance was observed in the treated patients (17.4±0.8, p = 0.081)( Figure 6B ).
a trend towards significanceP = 0.0811.6× alpha
The likelihood ratio for for-profit vs not-for-profit status was not significant for any of the quartiles; however, there was a trend towards significance for quartile 4 (Q4: LR = 3.05, P = 0.081), implying possible concentration of for-profits in the bottom quartile (Other quartiles Q1: LR = 1.51, P = 0.219; Q2: LR = 0.51, P = 0.474; Q3: LR = 0.95, P = 0.329).