Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend towards significance”

2,761 sentences · 2,761 papers · 3,605 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
On average, the proposed method scored slightly lower in proximal vessels due to the slightly lower spatial resolution used in this study and minor artifacts seen in some subjects, but in distal MCA branches arterial visualization was much better (mean score 2.6 for VEPCASL versus 1.1 for TOF), with a trend towards significance ( p = 0.06).
a trend towards significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
The seroprevalence of FIV infection was not significantly different between ‘healthy’ and ‘sick’ cats using the aforementioned definitions (14% vs 16%; P = 0.17), although when cats classified with dental disease were excluded from analysis there was a trend towards significance ( P = 0.06).
a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
The animals injected with KO macrophages presented an intermediate initial EF of 38.8 ± 3.1% which is higher than the baseline EF of the non-surviving WT-injected mice, with a trend towards significance (p = 0.06) and somewhat lower than the baseline EF of the animals which have survived the inoculation of the WT macrophages (p = 0.2) ( Fig 5B ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
A trend towards significance was found for real excitatory HF rTMS or iTBS vs sham in reducing anxiety at the end of treatment (MD = − 0.36; 95% CI − 0.73, 0.02; p = 0.06), but not at 1-month follow-up.
a trend towards significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
When the analysis was repeated for each handedness group separately, the relationship between volume asymmetry of the SLF I and lateralization of performance in the pegboard test was significant only for the right-handers ( r = −0.542, P < 0.05) in the place condition with a trend towards significance also for the left-handers ( r = −0.545, P = 0.06).
a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Cognim app For the alert mood visual analogue scale, a trend towards significance ( F (13,1,287) = 1.69, p = 0.06) was explored further with a series of one-way ANOVAs; comparing each treatment at each post-dose assessment.