a trend toward significancep < 0.1
A decrease ( p < 0.05) in polymorphonuclear neutrophils infiltration and a trend toward significance in LVF efflux clarity ( p < 0.1) were observed in TRT cycles.
← all phrases
“a trend toward significance”
In the literature
a trend toward significanceP < 0.10
Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05 and a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
a trend toward significancep = 0.1
A trend toward significance was observed for tibia values (p = 0.1), with lower injured values.
a trend toward significancep = 0.10
A statistically significant group × time interaction was observed in the Oral Control subscale (F = 4.82, p = 0.0147), while a trend toward significance was noted in the Bulimia and Food Preoccupation subscale (F = 5.31, p = 0.10).
Significant difference was considered at p<0.05 and a trend toward significance was considered at 0.05<p<0.1.
a trend toward significancep = 0.100
A trend toward significance in the overall stress appraisal was observed [ F (2, 112) = 2.354, p = 0.100, partial η 2 = 0.040].
a trend toward significanceP < 0.1
First, univariate Cox regression identified three variables with a trend toward significance for PFS (P < 0.1): BMI, HALP, and SII; and three variables for OS (P < 0.05): location, HALP, and post-treatment SII changes.
a trend toward significanceP < 0.1
Although not reaching the conventional threshold for statistical significance, certain indicators demonstrated a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1).
a trend toward significancep < 0.10
Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, and a trend toward significance was considered for 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.
a trend toward significanceP ≤ 0.10
Main effects were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05 and a trend toward significance when P ≤ 0.10.
a trend toward significanceP < 0.1
Variables showing a trend toward significance in univariate analysis ( P < 0.1) were included in a forward stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model (entry: α = 0.05; removal: α = 0.1).
a trend toward significancep < 0.1
Variables demonstrating a trend toward significance (p < 0.1) were included in the final multiple linear regression models.
a trend toward significancep < 0.10
Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s testing revealed statistically significant between-group differences at day 6 ( p = 0.027) and day 10 ( p = 0.009), with a trend toward significance at day 3 and day 20 (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).
a trend toward significanceP < 0.10
Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05 and considered a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
a trend toward significanceP < 0.1
Variables that showed a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1) were included in the multivariate models.
a trend toward significancep < 0.10
Multivariable model was constructed considering all features that were found statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or with a trend toward significance at the univariate analysis ( p < 0.10) as independent variables and the bilateral mapping (failure/success) as the dependent variable.
a trend toward significancep = 0.10
Individual electrode stimulation produced a greater increase in intrinsic theta-band activity than did generic electrodes for the ACC but this difference only showed a trend toward significance by t test [t (10) = 1.80, p = 0.10].
a trend toward significancep < 0.1
An initial univariate analysis was conducted, followed by a multivariate model including only those variables that were statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or showed a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis.
a trend toward significanceP < 0.1
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to correct for risk factors that showed at least a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1) in the univariate analysis.
a trend toward significanceP ≤ 0.10
Main effects were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05 and were considered as a trend toward significance when P ≤ 0.10.
a trend toward significancep < 0.10
Variables significantly associated with OS in univariate analysis ( p < 0.05), as well as those showing a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10), were entered into a multivariate Cox regression model to identify independent prognostic factors.
a trend toward significanceP < 0.1
For the multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression model, we included factors that were significant or that showed a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1) in a univariable model and performed backward elimination ( P < 0.05) using the “standard method” of removing the variable with the largest P -value.
a trend toward significancep ≤ 0.10
The significance level was previously set at p < 0.05 with a trend toward significance being accepted at p ≤ 0.10.
a trend toward significancep < 0.10
Significance was considered at the level of p < 0.05 (0.05 < p < 0.10 was considered a trend toward significance).
a trend toward significanceP < 0.10
Significance was defined as P < 0.05, and a trend toward significance as 0.05 < P < 0.10.