Moreover, at the four-week follow-up, a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) was observed utilizing the unpaired t-test when comparing the time spent completing the cognitive TUG and MoCA scores of the HIGT and control group, with the HIGT group outperforming.
Additional analyses revealed that Type of Problem showed a trend toward significance for students with no NLC [F (1,116) = 2.96, MSE = .274, p < .1, ηp 2 = .025], but was not significant for students with one or more NLC [F (1,158) = 1.89, MSE = .296, p > .1, ηp 2 = .012].
For items showing a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the Friedman test, post hoc comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm correction. 3.
A trend toward significance (0.05 < p < 0.1) was observed for pulmonary superinfection and SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity at hospital admission.
Although it did not reach p<0.05 FDR corrected significance, there was a trend toward significance in the left lingual gyrus for the TIN>HL contrast as well (the region reached significance at p<0.1 FDR corrected).
Clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural variables were initially examined, and those found to be significant in the univariate analysis, as well as those showing a trend toward significance ( P < 0.10), were included in the multivariate model.
Consistently, Ga(NO 3 ) 3 significantly exacerbated the effects of erastin, a well-characterized ferroptosis-inducer, in U251 cells with only a trend toward significance in the U87 cells ( p = 0.1, Figure 2 A).
4-Penten-1-ol produced analgesia that was statistically significant before but not after correction ( t 10 = 3.0, P = 0.01), and 1-octen-3-ol produced a trend toward significance before correction ( t 11 = 1.8, P = 0.10). n -Pentyl acetate (CH 3 COO[CH 2 ] 4 CH 3 ; CAS no. 628-63-7), also known as amyl acetate, is very similar in its chemical structure to isoamyl (or isopentyl) acetate, and both are found in a variety of fruits and used to produce banana oil/extract.
Factors that showed a trend toward significance in the univariate analysis ( p < 0.1) were then entered into a step-down multivariable linear regression analysis to determine independent risk factors.
Variables that were statistically significant or showed a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) in univariate analysis were included in an ordinal logistic regression model to identify independent predictors associated with higher Marsh grades.
Significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and a trend toward significance was declared at P ≤ 0.10.
Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, and a trend toward significance was considered at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
Among control variables, marital status was included in the final model, as it showed a trend toward significance ( p <.10) in the bivariate analysis.
Significance was defined as p < 0.05, and a trend toward significance was defined as 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10.
In this particular structure, the direct assessment of the phosphorylation rate of AMPK only reveals a trend toward significance (p = 0.1) for a greater activation after i.c.v. injection of AICAR.
With respect to the individual MRI components that composed the two MRDSS versions, only T1/T2 and BPF showed significantly increased severity in the cognitively impaired group ( P <0.05); GMF showed a trend toward significance ( P <0.10), and the moderate effect size for this difference approached the level seen for T1/T2 and BPF.
These were APH1B ( p < 0.05) and BAG6 , which displayed a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1).
S1 Results Additional findings that were statistically not significant, but showed a trend toward significance (0.05 < p < 0.10).
The tumor site and LMR showed a trend toward significance (0.05 < P < 0.1).
While the p ‐values did not reach the conventional threshold of statistical significance ( p < 0.05), the proportion of female patients (Figure 4A ) and the proportion of TKI usage (Figure 4B ) appear to be negatively associated with the CRR, as both variables demonstrate a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1).
Significance was defined as P < 0.05, and a trend toward significance as 0.05 < P < 0.10.
Results from the association tests were considered significant if: 1) the p -value from the all-sib analysis was lower than 0.0005, and 2) the one-sib analysis also showed a trend toward significance ( p -value < 0.1).
Furthermore, there was a trend toward significance of the entire model (multiple R = 0.3, multiple R 2 = 0.08, adjusted R 2 = 0.04, F = 1.98, p = 0.1).
We observed a stronger effect for Erps (β 1 = 0.087 +/- 0.053, logistic regression, Fig 7E ) with a trend toward significance (p = 0.1).
Calcium excretion similarly exhibited significant temporal variation ( p = 0.0025) and beverage type showed a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10).