a trend toward significanceP < 0.1
(2022) found that two miRNAs, hsa-mir-4516 and hsa-mir-381-3p, exhibited a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1) ( 108 ).
(2022) found that two miRNAs, hsa-mir-4516 and hsa-mir-381-3p, exhibited a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1) ( 108 ).
In the univariate analysis, many variables showed a trend toward significance( p < 0.10).
For both multivariable models, variables with clinical significance or those showing a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis were included using a backward stepwise procedure.
Exact P -values are shown for comparisons with a trend toward significance (0.05≤ P <0.10).
All statistical tests were two‐tailed, and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05, with a trend toward significance if 0.05 < P < 0.1 and toward non‐significance if P > 0.1.
An exhaustive model selection process was conducted, evaluating all possible combinations of pre-operative and planned parameters that showed a trend toward significance in univariate analysis ( P < .1).
Also there were a trend toward significance for whole brain skeleton FD values between ALS-CST+ and both ALS-CST– (p = 0.10) and ALS-Cl patients (p = 0.10).
A trend toward significance ( p < 0.10), with males showing higher values than females, was also observed for body weight (BW), occipital to tail-base length (OT), tarsal pad to heel distance (TH), and subcutaneous fat thickness at the lumbar level measured via real-time ultrasonography.
First, there was a pattern of poorer scores for the EHR group on the WAI, including a trend toward significance ( P =.10) on the subscale focused on agreement on tasks to achieve identified goals.
Specifically, PASS achievement demonstrated a trend toward significance in Kujala scores and certain KOOS subscores ( p < 0.1).
Least square means are reported with treatment effects declared significant at P < 0.05 and with a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
This is corroborated by our finding of significant correlations between serum SDC4 and urinary catecholamines and a trend toward significance ( p = 0.1) for the association between SDC4 and ECO ( Table 2 ).
In the multivariable model, we included variables that showed a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariable analysis.
It was observed that the assessors perceived significant differences ( p < 0.05) in the taste of milk between Transversus abdominis —HAS and the other two treatments and in the taste of urine between the Transversus abdominis —NHS and Transversus abdominis -HAS, as well as a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) for other odours between Transversus abdominis —HAS and the other two treatments.
For set 3, age showed a trend toward significance, with the intercept being 0.19 for newborns ( [ − 0.03 , 0.40 ] , z = 1.72 , p < 0.1 ), and the decreases in effect magnitude were 0.07 for 6-month-olds, 0.36 for 7-month-olds, and 0.29 for 9-month-olds (Table S6 in the Supplementary Material ).
Those proteins that had both a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) and a log 2 fold change > ±0.5 detected in the mutant compared to WT-overexpressing cells are shown in Figure S3 .
We also observed a trend toward significance between vitamin D sufficiency and lower odds of overweight/obesity after controlling for covariates ( p < 0.10).
After correction for CRP, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, primary EGFR mutation, and WHO performance status >1, only a trend toward significance remained for osimertinib exposure (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89–1.00; p = 0.10).
All significant variables (p < 0.05) and those with a trend toward significance (p < 0.10) were entered into the regression model using the forward conditional method.
A trend toward significance was also noted between the black and brown groups ( p < 0.10).
Overall, the model that included genotype, smoking status, and their interaction term accounted for 9% of the variance (adjusted R 2 = 0.086, p -value <0.004) with significant main effects of smoking status (SS = 2.98, p -value <0.03) and a trend toward significance for both genotype (SS = 1.72, p -value <0.10) and the interaction term (SS = 2.15, p -value <0.07).
TSH and leptin levels did not change significantly during the study while mean insulin levels lowered from 6.8 μIU/ml to 6.0 μIU/ml, but it was only a trend toward significance ( p < .1) ( Table 1 ).
Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05 and considered a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
P -values < 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance, with a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
Men felt significantly more supported with a neutral voice digital human than with one with an emotional voice (mean 68.03, SD 18.49, vs mean 56.29, SD 18.38; P =.002), whereas women felt more supported with an emotional voice digital human than men (mean 62.18, SD 19.25, vs mean 56.29, SD 18.38), however, this was a trend toward significance ( P =.10).