Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significancep = 0.0711.4× alpha
The elicited activation differences in the dACC were robust after ROI-based FWE correction (peak at [−12, 26, 34]; see Table 3 ), and the DLPFC cluster showed a trend toward significance when correcting for the respective ROI volume (peak at [−27, 29, 31], FWE-corrected p = 0.071; Table 8 and Figure 4 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0711.4× alpha
a trend toward significancep = 0.0771.5× alpha
In this case, a trend toward significance suggested the inclusion of time ( χ 2 (4) = 8.4, p = 0.077), where the evaluation at T2 showed a trend toward improvement compared to the baseline ( p = 0.071), probably as an effect of the task repetition since the assessment was repeated in a shorter time (every month) up to T2 and then with longer time intervals (see Figure 3 ).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0711.4× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.5911.8× alphaplainly factual
The tumor size also showed a trend toward significance (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3; p = 0.071), while the patient age and Ki-67 proliferation index did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.59 and p = 0.41, respectively) (Table 2 ).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.0711.4× alpha
In the multivariable analysis, pancreatobiliary cancer remained an independent factor associated with shorter TRBO (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.13–5.51; P = 0.024), whereas SBE-ERCP showed a trend toward significance (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.93–5.88; P = 0.071) (Table 5 ).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0711.4× alpha
However, the effect of GLR became more pronounced over time, with a trend toward significance at 18 months (Std. β [95% CI] = 0.57 [−0.00; 1.15], p = 0.071) and significant group by time-point interactions emerging at 30 months (Std. β [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.24; 1.45], p = 0.012) and 42 months (Std. β [95% CI] = 0.71 [0.09; 1.33], p = 0.036, Supplementary Table 1 ).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0721.4× alpha
In MS eyes, we found a decrease in the mean thickness of ppIRLs compared to the control group, which was statistically significant for ppGCL (MS = 31.4 ± 2.6 μ, control = 32.7 ± 1.9 μ, p < 0.001), and showed a trend toward significance for ppRNFL (MS = 41.6 ± 5.2 μ, control = 42.8 ± 4.5 μ, p = 0.072) and ppIPL (MS eyes 27.2 ± 2 μ, control 26.7 ± 1.6 μ, p = 0.074).