“a trend toward significance”

0.05 < P values ≤ 0.10 were interpreted as a trend toward significance.

This might be partially due to the small sample size, as a trend toward significance was observed in severe OSAS patients.

Furthermore, when there was a trend toward significance, the four groups based on diet were reported for better visualization.

A trend toward significance of BMI z ‐score was noted in the pediatric population and this should be re‐evaluated in future studies.

Differences at 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10 were considered as a trend toward significance. 3.

(2019) when examining the association between computerized lung score relative to lung consolidation found a trend toward significance with a difference only between normal and moderate acute scores.

In this sense, the findings obtained in our study reinforce this statement, since LA volume > 40 mL/m 2 was more prevalent in the recurrence group and showed a trend toward significance in survival analysis.

Considering the interaction of group and specific walking conditions, during UW patients with FSHD exhibited behaviour largely comparable to that of HC, with no significant differences observed between the groups for any of the parameters investigated, despite a trend toward significance for a longer GC (Fig. 1 ).

Although our data demonstrated only a trend toward significance for overall survival (OS), this endpoint-specific finding could highlight the precise prognostic value of COMP.

For race, the chi‐square test yielded a p ‐value of 0.06, indicating a trend toward significance.

Despite showing a trend toward significance in univariate analysis, increased cervical lordosis (C2–C6 angle) was not confirmed as an independent predictor in multivariate analysis.

Additionally, in responders the time from the HF diagnosis to the implantation of the LVAD was significantly shorter, a previous thoracotomy was less common, and there was a trend toward significance for higher baseline BNP levels compared to non-responders.

Multivariate analysis did not identify specific risk factors for recurrence, although larger cyst size showed a trend toward significance.

Altogether, patients classified as responders ( n = 9) displayed a trend toward significance of increased ex vivo sensitivity (median DSS of 51.8), compared to patients achieving a poor response ( n = 4) (median DSS of 23.4) [minimal response (MR) = 1, stable disease (SD) = 1, progressive disease (PD) = 2] (Fig. 7F ).

While NLR quartiles showed a trend toward significance in the unadjusted model (p for trend < 0.05), no significant associations emerged when NLR was analyzed as a continuous variable in unadjusted or adjusted models.

Preoperatively, the mean number of medications used was slightly higher in the large plate group than the medium plate group, although it was not statistically different (p = 0.31), and was slightly lower at all 3 years of follow-up, with a trend toward significance at year 2 ( Table 3B ).

It is important to note that while the differences observed in these pathways demonstrated a trend toward significance (FDR = 0.1236), they do not meet the commonly used threshold of FDR < 0.05.

In the univariate analysis, only SBP-CV and DBP-CV were significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcomes, although a trend toward significance was seen in other parameters.

B However, in the hippocampus there was a trend toward significance, with α-IL-6 treated animals have lower CC3.

Significance was determined as being at p < 0.05, a trend toward significance signaled by p < 0.15. 3.

A significant treatment × time interaction was identified for PC2, while PC3 showed a trend toward significance.

The results with Δ p < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant, while those with 0.05 < Δ p < 0.1 were considered a trend toward significance to increase the statistical power.

In spite of this, PRS-7 showed a trend toward significance and the PRS-3 sensitivity analysis was significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

The occurrence of other types of headaches varied, with a p-value of 0.056, which indicates there may be a trend toward significance but is not statistically conclusive.

While this difference became significant for monaural listening, a trend toward significance was seen for the binaural response.