Although there was a trend toward significance for Reading Span Longest score ( r s = −0.42), Letter-Number Sequencing score ( r s = −0.41), and Letter-Number Sequencing Longest score ( r s = −0.44), the negative direction of these trends was contrary to expectations, as they appeared to be driven by a positive relationship between working memory and intelligibility of low-context sentences specifically.
← all phrases
“a trend toward significance”
In the literature
Education and the interaction term between amnestic SCD and SOI (Exp(B) = OR, P = 0.054) remained in the final model showing a trend toward significance.
While the p -value (0.056) suggests a trend toward significance, it falls just short of the conventional threshold.
In the absence of additional statistical data one would assume a trend toward significance without quite reaching statistical significance.
Although statistical significance was not achieved in the holdout set, we did observe a trend toward significance for the R-score.
On all tests p < 0.05 was considered significant and 0.05 < p < 0.1 a trend toward significance.
Furthermore, t -tests examining the differences in viewing duration between adolescents and adults for each category revealed significant longer durations in adults only with respect to the lower two weight categories, extremely underweight and underweight, and a trend toward significance was also noted for the normal-weight category (see Figure 2 and Table S2, Supplementary Materials ).
No significant interactions were observed for BMI or gender, but there was a trend toward significance, where the rate of energy expenditure achieved was 34% higher in males.
We speak of a trend toward significance when a given comparison would be significant without such correction.
In regard to the Stuart, McGinty [ 44 ] study on the The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (2008), a trend toward significance was observed.
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and 0.05 < p < 0.10 was considered a trend toward significance. 3.
Second, variables at least presenting a significant association (p-value <0.05) or a trend toward significance (p-value between 0.05 and 0.1) were used for consecutive regression testing.
After adjustment for age group and sex, the overall effect of PH risk on RI did not reach statistical significance but showed a trend toward significance.
Although a trend toward significance was observed for PEG3 , the study did not detect any significant differential gene-specific DNA methylation between the patients and controls for any of the other candidate genes.
The SF36v2 MCS ( p = 0.069, Δ = 1.77, t = 1.6) showed a trend toward significance.
We also observed a trend toward significance of exposure × time for sway length, left leg, and for sway area, eyes open.
However, there was a trend toward significance when comparing the uremic females to the female controls.
Finally, there was a trend toward significance for the interaction between expertise and DA (see Tables 1 , 2 and Figure 2 ).
β-diversity using UniFrac distance matrix also showed a trend toward significance after first blocking by time point ( Fig. 2 C), suggesting that the group undergoing CPB/DHCA is the dominant factor driving microbiome community dissimilarities.
Although there was a trend toward significance, APOE ɛ4 status was comparable in CS and MCI‐DS and in CS and DS‐AD participants.
47 Using ROI-based analysis, no correlation was found between GM-CBF and NfL neither in CU nor in the individuals on the AD continuum (p (FDR) > 0.05, see Supplementary Table 10) although there was a trend toward significance in middle frontal for the latter group (β = −0.0985, p (FDR) = 0.0503).
Significant differentially abundant genera or those with a trend toward significance were detected across all CRC enterotypes as compared to healthy relatives, with Escherichia showing greater enrichment in CRC exhibiting enterotypes 2 and 3 (ET_P and ET_F) ( Supplementary Figure S2 ).
There was a trend toward significance regarding mean trough level of serum tacrolimus during 1st month.
A p -value of <0.05 was considered significant, and values between 0.05 and 0.1 were assessed as indicating a trend toward significance.
13 The factors male gender, using fewer tools to prevent forgetting, and patients' having an indifferent attitude toward medicines showed a trend toward significance in multivariate analysis.