Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp = 0.0180.4× alphagold
Further, relative to APOE ε4 + ve/ KIBRA T carriers, the APOE ε4 + ve/ KIBRA non-T carrier group showed a nominally significantly greater rate of decline on the verbal episodic memory composite, however after FDR correction this remained only a strong trend (p = 0.018, q = 0.055) over six years (Fig. 2 , Table 3 ).
a strong trendp = 0.020.4× alphagold
Results showed a strong trend toward improved survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, p = 0.02) in patients who received MVAC. 6 Because of the high incidence of adverse effects such as myelosuppression in patients taking MVAC, dose-dense MVAC (ddMVAC) was introduced which delivered the drug in two weekly cycles with growth factor support to abrogate this side effect. ddMVAC was well tolerated, with a ypT0 rate of 38% in one trial which included node-positive patients. 7 Numerous other trials were conducted in this space over the decades, some of which we have summarized below.
a strong trendp<0.020.4× alphagold
Interestingly, despite treating tumors of heterogenous sizes (right bigger or smaller than left) (Figure 5 b), the biofluorescence was systematically higher on the treated side at all timepoints (Figure 6 b), a strong trend that was detected by two-way ANOVA testing (effect of side, all p<0.02).
a strong trendp = 0.020.4× alphagold
However, these differences did not withstand post-hoc comparisons with a Bonferroni-corrected level of significance of 0.01, but showed a strong trend towards significance on the first ( p = 0.02, connection to EEG-recording system in the test group) and the last day ( p = 0.012, PET measurement in the test group) of the experiment. 3.3.2.
a strong trendP = 0.0240.5× alphagold
Although both of the groups improved in accuracy of naming significantly in each consecutive testing point, there was only a strong trend in E group toward a significant increase in naming 15 weeks after rTMS treatment compared with C group ( U = 20, P = 0.024), but the differences were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
a strong trendp = 0.0250.5× alphagold
Within this subgroup, GLS demonstrated a strong trend of negative correlation with several myocardial injury markers: a perfect negative correlation with CK-MB (rs = −1.000, p = 0.025), and negative correlations with hs-cTnI (rs = −0.700) and NT-proBNP (rs = −0.500).
a strong trendP = 0.02570.5× alphagold
15 An interim overall survival (OS) analysis demonstrated a strong trend in favor of ELd (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61, 0.97; P = 0.0257), in which there was a clear separation in the tail end of the Kaplan–Meier curves ( Figure 5 ). 15 Median (95% CI) OS was 43.7 months (40.3, not estimable (NE)) in the ELd arm and 39.6 months (33.3, NE) in the Ld arm. 15 The 4‐year PFS data