Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp = 0.02730.5× alphagold
Moreover, there was a strong trend toward improved OS in favor of the retifanlimab arm (median OS: 29.2 months vs. 23.0 months; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.49–1.01; p = 0.0273), although survival data were immature at data cutoff [ 43 ].
SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for anal cancer (2025).
Clin Transl Oncol · 2026 · PMC13009044
a strong trendP = 0.0280.6× alphagold
Finally, the index for the (correct) answer “machine” in the machine condition was either significantly higher or with a strong trend in controls (2.6 ± 0.6) compared to both patient subgroups (DoC = 0.5 ± 0.2, U = 56.5, P = 0.028, η 2 = 0.17; NoDoC = 0.4 ± 0.1, U = 51, P = 0.014, η 2 = 0.21).
a strong trendp = 0.0280.6× alphagold
There was an overall effect of ramipril, which reduced the annualized slope of the mean maximum IMT (intimal medial thickness) versus ramipril placebo (p = 0.033), and there was a strong trend for benefit in the ramipril 10 mg/day group versus ramipril placebo (p = 0.028).
a strong trendp = 0.030.6× alphagold
While Hb at the time of bone metastases detection was not significant when using the median value as cut-off, a strong trend for correlation between Hb ≤ 12.0 g/dL and short survival was found, p = 0.03 (when correcting for the fact that 2 tests were performed, i.e. median Hb and Hb ≤ 12.0 g/dL, the Bonferroni correction requires p ≤ 0.025).
a strong trendp < 0.030.6× alphagold
They showed a highly significant improvement in their sense of competence in programming ( p < 0.0004) and a strong trend toward an increased sense of competence in biology ( p < 0.03) and a more positive attitude toward programming ( p < 0.023; post hoc t tests using the Bonferroni correction).
a strong trendP = 0.0340.7× alphagold
The presence of the high-affinity FCGR2A - 131H allele in either homo/heterozygous combinations (HH and HR) in PsA patients receiving etanercept showed a strong trend to a higher rate of EULAR response compared with those without a response (93 vs. 67 %; P = 0.034) [ 17 ].
a strong trendp ≤ 0.040.8× alphagold
For both the 80°C and 90°C burns there was a strong trend of increasing perfusion with time post-burn, with B/N ratios at day 7 significantly higher than at 24hrs and day 3 (p ≤ 0.04, p ≤ 0.03). 4 Discussion An effective burn model must have reliable and consistent tissue injury.
a strong trendP = 0.0410.8× alphagold
Interestingly, inflammation level in the two groups of patients showed a strong trend towards a positive correlation ( χ 2 = 4.167, P = 0.041 ) ( Supplementary Figure 1 and Table 1 ), indicating a more pro-inflammatory microenvironment in patients with advanced fibrosis although their viral parameters and other clinical characteristics were comparable.
a strong trendp = .0410.8× alphagold
In the observation group, we found favorable prognostic effects of low MUC1 expression (HR for DFS: 0.55; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.04, p = .062; HR for OS: 0.35, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.68, p = .001) as well as a strong trend for improved survival in the gemcitabine group (HR for DFS: 0.48; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.96, p = .041; HR for OS: 0.56, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.11, p = .093), see Figures 3E–H : Survival analyses in subgroups for gemcitabine vs. observation.
a strong trendp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
ACEi/ARBs (46%) and CCBs (27%) accounted for the majority of these (Table 3 ). Baseline SBP ≥ 130 mmHg (OR: 5.32; 95% CI: 0.94-29.99; p = 0.058) had a strong trend towards significance as a univariate predictor of development of HTN, and treatment with an ACEi or ARB (OR: 4.88; 95% CI: 1.05-22.84; p = 0.044) was a significant univariate predictor of development of pazopanib-induced HTN (Table 4 ).
a strong trendP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Experienced caterpillars spent a longer time in arms permeated with either DMNT or ( Z )-3-hexenyl acetate than in control arms ( N = 25, Z = −2.623, P = 0.009 and N = 22, Z = −2.256, P = 0.024, respectively), but avoided benzyl cyanide, and they showed a strong trend towards the avoidance of salicyl aldehyde ( N = 22, Z = −1.997, P = 0.046 and N = 22, Z = −1.834, P = 0.067, respectively).