Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendP =0.0541.1× alphagold
While there was no statistical significance in the prevalence of inflammation or bone in the root canals, there was a strong trend ( P =0.054 in the 6-week no cautery vs 6-week cautery) that cauterization resulted in the presence of increased cell debris and impacted the quality of healing.
Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg · 2019 · PMC6502752
a strong trendp = .0541.1× alphagold
Expression of several SASP markers showed a positive correlation to p16 INK4a levels despite no correlation to age: insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 3 ( IGFBP3 , r 2 = .0971, p = .018), matrix metalloproteinase 1 ( MMP‐1 , r 2 = .1247, p < .01), and a strong trend for MMP‐13 ( r 2 = .0667, p = .054).
a strong trendp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Interestingly, in females, a 2-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of exposure ( Figure 2B : F (1, 16) = 8.198, p < 0.05) and an exposure × week interaction ( F (2, 32) = 5.07, p < 0.05), with a strong trend toward a main effect of week ( F (2, 32) = 3.208, p = 0.054).
a strong trendp=0.0541.1× alphagold
There was also a strong trend towards a 4-way interaction between lesion group, surgery, previous outcome and pre- or post-reversal ( F 1,8 = 5.12, p=0.054); switch rates selectively increased in the MDmc group after surgery and this was particularly pronounced after a reward (average post-surgery increase in switch probability: after reward 0.15 ± 0.07, post-hoc tests: p=0.051; after no reward: 0.08 ± 0.06, p=0.23).
a strong trendP = 0.0541.1× alphagold
After adjusting the Cox proportionate hazards model for age, sex, insulin‐dependent diabetes, hypertension, renal impairment, chronic obstructive lung disease, and congestive heart failure, a strong trend for lower long‐term survival of patients with a higher IFT score was demonstrated (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4‐1.0; P = 0.054; Figure 2 ). 4.