Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Relationship between LUS and CXR Scores The regression model between the CXR score and LUS score demonstrated a strong trend (slope 0.160, 95%CI 0.109 to 0.212, p < 0.001); however, there was significant variability around the regression line (R 2 = 0.128; Supplementary Files S2 and S3 ).
a strong trendP<0.0010.0× alphagold
Using our validated histological scoring system, we were able to detect significantly more villous distortion and total inflammation in TNF i∆ARE/i∆ARE → SCID mice compared to wt → SCID mice, and a strong trend towards more chronic inflammation as well (villous distortion index: 4.00 ± 0.00 vs. 2.00 ± 0.00, P<0.001; chronic inflammatory index: 4.5 ± 1.05 vs. 0.75 ± 0.75, P=0.06; total inflammatory score: 9.25 ± 1.19 vs. 3.25 ± 1.25, P<0.05).
a strong trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The RNA-inferred community showed a strong trend toward homogenization across sites ( F 2 , 219 = 23.33, p < 0.001), with average pairwise similarity increasing over the progression of agricultural development across our sites (i.e., the chronosequence, Canberra: forest mean: 0.289 ± 0.008, burned mean: 0.327 ± 0.004, plantation mean: 0.340, ± 0.004).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
a strong trendP = 0.06241.2× alphagold
This revealed a highly significant covariation of freezing with synaptically expressed GluA1 (sGluA1, r 2 = 0.9648, P < 0.001) but not extrasynaptically expressed GluA1, although we still detected a strong trend (eGluA1, r 2 = 0.6217, P = 0.0624).
a strong trendp = 0.0010.0× alphagold
Among the considered variables: age, non-endometrioid histotype, and LVSI appeared to be significantly correlated with mapping failure at univariate analysis, while BMI showed a strong trend towards significance (age ≥ 65 OR: 1.667, 95% CI: 1.230–2259, p = 0.001; BMI per 1 unit-increase OR: 1.021, 95% CI: 1.000-1.044, p = 0.054; non-endometrioid histotype OR: 1.813, 95% CI: 1.218–2.700, p = 0.003; presence of LVSI OR: 1.492, 95% CI: 1.084-2.053, p = 0.014).
a strong trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
This association demonstrated greater magnitude for heart disease subtypes, where Q4 exhibited 50.9% increased risk versus Q1 (OR = 1.509, 95% CI: 1.118–2.046) and each 1-SD increment conferred 19.8% higher risk (OR = 1.198, 95% CI: 1.079–1.331), with a strong trend significance ( P < 0.001) (Additional file 1: Table S3).
a strong trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Although the groups showed a strong trend of decreasing MoM with increasing weight ( p < 0.001; Jonckheere’s test), individual comparisons among the three groups (without regard to the ordering of categories) found no real difference between ELBW and VLBW ( p = 0.201; Steel-Dwass multiple comparison procedure) while each of the two lower groups both differed from the LBW group ( p < 0.001 for each; Steel-Dwass).
a strong trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Critically, among women undergoing conservative management for CIN2, receipt of prophylactic HPV vaccination after diagnosis was associated with a significantly reduced cumulative incidence of progression (E, log-rank p = 0.034) and a strong trend toward a higher regression rate (F, log-rank p < 0.001), compared with the unvaccinated group.