Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp = .0030.1× alphagold
Finally, at 30 degrees to the right, surprised faces were recognized significantly better than disgusted faces ( t (13) = 4.53, p = .0006; d = 1.21; Mean Surprised = 0.61, Mean Disgusted = -.03) while a strong trend was present for happy faces to be better recognized than disgusted faces which did not survive correction ( t (13) = 3.64, p = .003; d = .97; Mean Happy = 0.71, Mean Disgusted = -.03).
a strong trendp = 0.0050.1× alphagold
A significant interaction with gene status was found in left amygdala and a strong trend in right amygdala resulted from PSCs failing to show the expected positive correlation with negative feedback ( T = 4.02; p = 0.005; at x , y , z = −18, −6, −12 and T = 3.37; p = 0.06 at x , y , z = 18, −8, −14; Fig. 2 ).
Irritability in pre-clinical Huntington's disease.
Neuropsychologia · 2010 · PMC2809920
a strong trendp < 0.0060.1× alphagold
The primacy/recency ratio increased in parallel with omnibus scores [ r = 0.25, t (189) = 3.55, p < 0.0005] and, consistent with previous results (Capitani et al., 1992 ; Golomb et al., 2008 ), showed a strong trend toward decline with increasing age [ r = −0.20, t (189) = −2.81, p < 0.006].
a strong trendp = 0.0060.1× alphagold
When dichotomizing according to neck pain at baseline in those who underwent the HECO examinations, the results from the pain group showed a strong trend towards improvements regarding clinical diagnoses ( p = 0.006), and a significant improvement in work ability ( p = 0.002) in the intervention group, compared to the reference group (Table 4 ).
a strong trendP = 0.0070.1× alphagold
Following that, the DESTINY-Breast03 ( NCT03529110 ) phase III trial found that T-DXd as a second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive MBC significantly improved PFS and had a strong trend of OS benefit (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; P = 0.007) when compared to T-DM1 (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.37; P < 0.001) [ 14 ].