Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a statistical trend”

2,799 sentences · 2,799 papers · 4,784 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a statistical trendp = 0.0851.7× alphagold
Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis of the respiratory bacterial profiles of the elephants revealed a statistical trend ( p = 0.085, PERMANOVA) toward sample type divergence, based on the deviation of inter-sample diversity of the TW and ETT samples ( p = 0.029, p adj = 0.087).
a statistical trendp = .0851.7× alphagold
All age effects remained significant with large effect sizes (η 2 p ≥.14), except for the modality-by-age interaction across the whole RPE network, which showed a statistical trend ( p = .085; see Supplementary Material B.7 for more details). 4 Discussion This study provides insights into the behavioural and neural processing underlying multisensory learning in children, focusing on audio-visual and tactile-visual associations.
a statistical trendp=0.0851.7× alphagold
20 A study that looked at narrow-band imaging (NBI; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) for serrated polyp detection suggested a statistical trend toward improved detection with a mean number of serrated lesions proximal to the sigmoid of 0.51 with NBI versus 0.39 for white light (p=0.085). 21 A subsequent meta-analysis of NBI for detection of non-adenomatous (serrated) lesions suggested significantly improved detection with either first or s
a statistical trendp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
There was a statistical trend for dogs choosing the Both cup above chance (37.12 ± 9.87%; t-test, df = 21, t = 1.802, p = 0.086; Fig. 2 ), while the Subject-only cup was chosen above chance (43.94 ± 16.10%; t = 3.091, p = 0.006) and the Empty cup below chance (18.94 ± 11.26%; t=−5.993, p < 0.001; Fig. 2 ).
a statistical trendp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
Effect of vibration on in vivo active contractility and passive stiffness Plantarflexion torque about the ankle joint was ~18% lower in VML-0.6 g mice compared with VML-NoTx mice ( p = 0.030, Figure 1A ); however, when peak isometric-torque was normalized to gastrocnemius muscle-mass, a marker of muscle quality, there was only a statistical trend ( p = 0.086) for lower torque among VML-0.6 g mice ( Figure 1B ).
a statistical trendp = .0861.7× alphagold
Behavioral control-related ROIs In the right fronto-basal-ganglia ROIs, MMRM analysis revealed a statistical trend for main effect group ( F 1,41 = 3.09, p = .086) and group × ROI interaction ( F 5,38 = 2.14; p = .081), a main effect of ROI ( F 5,38 = 138.31; p < .001), but no main effect of BDI ( F 1,37 = 0.03; p = .868).