Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a slight trend”

4,079 sentences · 4,079 papers · 4,917 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In terms of BMPR1A , the expression of BMPR1A-Z was a bit male-biased at stage 6/7, but the following sharp decrease of BMPR1A-Z expression in ZZ males made it become significantly female-biased at later stages; however, BMPR1A-A did not show significant sex-biased expression throughout development, although a slight trend of male-biased expression was observed (Fig. 6F ).
In the hypertension cohort, there was a slight trend of decreasing magnitude of the mean cost over the 11 years for the shorter group; a decrease in mean cost was limited to years 2013 and 2014 in the longer group.
Even if monozygotic twins share 100% of their alleles and dizygotic ones only about 50% of their alleles, using the unweighted Unifrac distance, the authors observed that the difference between the microbial communities of each pair of twins was not statistically different, with only a slight trend toward greater similarity among cohabiting monozygotic pairs than dizygotic ones, suggesting a small genetic influence on microbiome composition.
Adjusted R 2 ‐values were similar for the nonspatial and two spatial models of more interest, though CON coefficients were more often significant ( p ≤ .05) for spatial than nonspatial, and HET coefficients showed a slight trend in the opposite direction (Appendix S1 : Table S4). 3.3 Effect sizes dependence on species’ plot basal area abundance and density Regressing the 38 species’ CON effect sizes on growth in P 1 , whether at the individual species’ level they were significant or not, against plot BA (log 10 ‐transformed), showed that the nonspatial model with “ba + CON + HET” led to a substantially better fit ( p ≤ .001) than with “ba + ALL” ( p = .18) (Table 3a ) and accounted for the maximum adjusted and predicted R 2 of all nonspatial and spatial models.