Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a slight trend”

4,079 sentences · 4,079 papers · 4,917 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

A pooled analysis of 8 randomized clinical trials involving 2281 patients with STS demonstrated a slight trend favoring doxorubicin-based combination therapy for ORR (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.60-1.05 [ P = .10]); these results, as well as OS data (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67-1.06 [ P = .13]), did not reach statistical significance compared with single-agent doxorubicin. 16 Nausea, vomiting, and myelosuppression were consistently more severe with the combination regimens.
a slight trendP < 0.12.0× alphagold
Significantly, there was a giant decrease in the level of total androgens in patients with SLE (P < 0.05), and there was a slight trend of elevation in total estrogens (P < 0.1, Figure 3 ). 3.5 Screening of altered steroid species in patients with SLE To reveal the specific alterations of steroids in patients with SLE, PLS-DA was conducted to compare the steroid profiles between two groups after OSC filtration.
a slight trendP = 0.12.0× alphagold
S4), but for TeRu4-treated birds on d 4, there was a slight but similar trend of decreased numbers of infected birds with increasing AMP dose (air sac: P = 0.009, pericardium: P = 0.1), and for PeNi4, on d 4, in the air sac only, there was a slight trend of increasing numbers of infected birds with increased AMP dose ( P = 0.1).
a slight trendp > 0.12.0× alphagold
We speculate that our test setting provided the visual system rich cues to the context that it could use to identify that the “normal” environment was present and so adjust rapidly to its “normal mode.” Adaptation within a given session reached a limit; during the last hour of adaptation, unique yellow settings did not even show a slight trend toward increasing (slope of a linear fit to settings during the last hour did not significantly differ from zero on all 5 days, all p > 0.1).
a slight trendp = 0.1082.2× alphagold
In addition, in the original data ( n = 54), there was also a slight trend toward a group difference in the domain of language [mixed-model ANOVA, Group × Time interaction, F (2.4, 51.9) = 2.2, p = 0.108)] over the 6-month follow-up, with more improvement in the MG than in the ABG ( p = 0.096), suggesting that the correlation between GMV and language skills is also meaningful.